Emertongone, Lin & Lopardo & Uhl, 2022 (Emerton, 1882)

Lin, Shou-Wang, Lopardo, Lara & Uhl, Gabriele, 2022, Evolution of nuptial-gift-related male prosomal structures: taxonomic revision and cladistic analysis of the genus Oedothorax (Araneae: Linyphiidae: Erigoninae), Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 195, pp. 417-584 : 525-529

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlab033

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BE2B3859-8F6A-4543-8A69-91840F82377B

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6968170

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B787C7-FFB1-765D-FC82-D2DA4847F129

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Emertongone
status

gen. nov.

EMERTONGONE MONTIFERA ( EMERTON, 1882) View in CoL COMB. NOV.

( FIGS 7A View Figure 7 , 66 View Figure 66 , 67C View Figure 67 , 68C; SUPPORTING View Figure 68 INFORMATION, FIG. S5B View Figure 5 )

Lophocarenum montiferum Emerton, 1882: 47 , pl. 13, fig. 2 (Dmf).

Gongylidium montiferum Simon, 1884: 500 .

Erigone montifera Marx, 1890: 535 .

Neriene montifera Simon, 1894: 633 . Oedothorax montiferus Crosby, 1905: 312 , 335. Diplocephalus montiferus Banks, 1916: 73 .

Oedothorax montiferus Bishop & Crosby, 1935: 266 , pl. 22, figs 74–78 (mf).

Oedothorax montiferus Kaston, 1948: 173 , figs 486– 492 (mf).

Oedothorax montifer Paquin & Dupérré, 2003: 115 View in CoL , figs 1186–1189 (mf).

Type material: Not designated. Type locality: Brookline and Salem, Mass. (Bishop & Crosby 1935). The clear illustrations of the male prosomal and palpal structures and epigyne in the original description allow the unambiguous identification of this species.

Examined material: USA: Pennsylvania, Lower Friederick Township (40°16’ N, 75°30’ W), 4♂ 3♀ iii.1954, Wilton Ivie coll. & det; Massachusetts, Middlwsex, Peperell, 1♀ 24.x.1970, det. Platnick; Massachusetts, Brookline (42°19’ N, 71°6’ W), 1♂ 1♀ 10.vi.1873, coll. J. H. Emerton; Ohio, Wayne County, Neil McCoy’s Woods, under rotting wood, 2♀ 25.iv.1959, J. A. Beatty.

Description:

Male (Pennsylvania): Total length: 1.70. Prosoma: 0.89 long, 0.67 wide, post-PME region largely elevated, with post-PME groove ( Fig. 7A View Figure 7 ). Eyes: AME-AME: 0.02, AME width: 0.04, AME-ALE: 0.12, ALE width: 0.06, ALE-PLE: 0.01, PLE width: 0.05, PLE-PME: 0.02, PME width: 0.04, PME-PME: 0.31. Clypeus: hirsute. Sternum: 0.48 long, 0.45 wide. Chelicerae: stridulatory striae rows widely and evenly spaced ( Fig. 67C View Figure 67 ). Legs: tibia chaetotaxy 2-2-1-1, dorsal proximal macroseta on tibia I, II, III and IV 0.35, 0.33, 0.33 and 0.49 times diameter of tibia, respectively; Tm I: 0.61. Metatarsi I–III with trichobothrium, IV without trichobothrium. Pedipalp: PC base visible from dorsal view, distal seta distally situated, distal clasp small; PT without papillae; TS absent; MSA round; DSA complex ( Fig. 66A View Figure 66 ); EM arised from distal part of DSA; R and E fused; E prolaterally spiral, tip retrolateral to DSA; TP, ARP, LER, and VRP absent ( Fig. 66C, D View Figure 66 ). Opisthosoma: evenly coloured, dark grey ( Fig. 68C View Figure 68 ).

Female (Pennsylvania): Total length: 1.70. Prosoma: 0.69 long, 0.65 wide. Eyes: AME-AME: 0.02, AME width: 0.04, AME-ALE: 0.04, ALE width: 0.06, ALE- PLE: 0.01, PLE width: 0.06, PLE-PME: 0.02, PME width: 0.05, PME-PME: 0.1. Clypeus: hirsute. Sternum: 47 long; 42 wide. Legs: tibia chaetotaxy 2-2-1-1, dorsal proximal macroseta on tibia I, II, III and IV 0.79, 0.77,

0.71 and 0.82 times diameter of tibia, respectively; Tm I: 0.56. Epigyne: dorsal plate extended anteriorly, bordering ventral plate by two lateral slits and an anterior slit, CO at lateral ends of anterior slit ( Fig. 66E–G View Figure 66 ). Opisthosoma: evenly coloured, dark grey.

Variation: The measurements are based on examined material.

Males (N = 5, means in parentheses): Total length 1.70 – 1.89 (1.79). Prosoma: 0.86 – 0.95 (0.89) long, 0.66 – 0.75 (0.68) wide. Legs: dorsal proximal macroseta on tibia I, II, III and IV 0.29 – 0.35 (0.32), 0.25 – 0.33 (0.30, N = 3), 0.19–0.33 (0.27, N = 4) and 0.30 – 0.49 (0.42) times diameter of tibia, respectively; Tm I: 0.53 – 0.61 (0.56).

Females (N = 7, means in parentheses): Total length 1.70 – 2.37 (2.09). Prosoma: 0.69 – 0.91 (0.81) long, 0.62 – 0.77 (0.69) wide. Legs: dorsal proximal macroseta on tibia I, II, III and IV 0.46 – 0.80 (0.69, N = 3), 0.52 – 0.78 (0.66, N = 4), 0.44 – 0.71 (0.58, N = 4) and 0.57 – 0.82 (0.72, N = 4) times diameter of tibia, respectively; Tm I: 0.53 – 0.62 (0.57).

Distribution: USA.

Habitat: Maple swamps ( Emerton, 1882).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Linyphiidae

Loc

Emertongone

Lin, Shou-Wang, Lopardo, Lara & Uhl, Gabriele 2022
2022
Loc

Emertongone

Lin & Lopardo & Uhl 2022
2022
Loc

Jilinus hulongensis ( Zhu & Wen, 1980 )

comb. 2022
2022
Loc

Cornitibia simplicithorax (Tanasevitch, 1998)

Lin & Lopardo & Uhl 2022
2022
Loc

Emertongone

Lin & Lopardo & Uhl 2022
2022
Loc

Oedothorax

Triceps Tanasevitch 2020
2020
Loc

paracymbialis

Tanasevitch 2015
2015
Loc

kodaikanal

Tanasevitch 2015
2015
Loc

cunur

Tanasevitch 2015
2015
Loc

stylus

Tanasevitch 2015
2015
Loc

Oedothorax montifer Paquin & Dupérré, 2003: 115

Paquin & Duperre 2003: 115
2003
Loc

nazareti

Scharff 1989
1989
Loc

Oedothorax montiferus

Kaston 1948: 173
1948
Loc

Oedothorax montiferus

Bishop & Crosby 1935: 266
1935
Loc

Diplocephalus montiferus

Banks 1916: 73
1916
Loc

Tmeticus tolli Kulczyński, 1908

Kulczynski 1908
1908
Loc

Oedothorax montiferus

Crosby 1905: 312
1905
Loc

Neriene montifera

Simon 1894: 633
1894
Loc

Erigone montifera

Marx 1890: 535
1890
Loc

Gongylidium montiferum

Simon 1884: 500
1884
Loc

Lophocarenum montiferum

Emerton 1882: 47
1882
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF