Scopaeus cuspilobatus Frisch, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.25674/so95iss1id311 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10724313 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B7C77A-FFD9-FFED-BC8F-FBDE0861004D |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Scopaeus cuspilobatus Frisch |
status |
sp. nov. |
Scopaeus cuspilobatus Frisch , spec. nov.
( Figs 16 View Figures 14–16 , 38 View Figures 35–41 , 92 – 94 View Figures 92–97 , 134, 167, 168)
Type specimens: Indonesia: Holotype ♂, Jawa Barat, Sukabumi: Sirnarasa ( Cimaja River ), (06°51’32’’S, 106°31’06’’E), 670 m, 21.9.2015, leg. Frisch ( MZB) GoogleMaps . Paratype: 1 ♀, same data as holotype ( MFNB) GoogleMaps .
Description: Habitus and coloring as in Fig. 16 View Figures 14–16 . Head subquadrate. Penultimate antennal segment quadrate. Mesotibia moderately thickened. Setose punctation of body surface fine, dense on subnitid head, rugulose on matt elytra, more spacious on shiny pronotum; microreticulation absent. Pubescence of body surface short, decumbent, without conspicuous macrosetae. Body dark brown except for narrow, light brown posterior margin of elytra and tip of abdomen; antennae medium brown with darker segments 2 – 6; maxillary palpi light brown with darker penultimate segment; legs light brown with medium brown femora. Total body length 3.6 mm; forebody length 2.0 – 2.1 mm.
Male: Abdominal sternite VII with unmodified posterior margin. Abdominal sternite VIII with posterior margin with two very short, lateral emarginations and barely recognizably concave middle (Fig. 134). Aedeagus ( Figs 38 View Figures 35–41 , 92 – 94 View Figures 92–97 ) about 0.8 mm long with asymmetrical distal lobes; apical lobes curved ventrad with round ends ( Figs 38 View Figures 35–41 , 92 View Figures 92–97 ), in ventral and dorsal view stout with broad, subtruncate apices ( Figs 93, 94 View Figures 92–97 ); dextral apical lobe with little, ventroproximal tooth ( Fig. 92 View Figures 92–97 : arrow I), convexly widened dextrad distally ( Figs 93, 94 View Figures 92–97 ); sinistral apical lobe evenly convex distolaterally, somewhat overlapping dextral apical lobe ventrally ( Fig. 93 View Figures 92–97 ); dorsal lobe broad with convex apex ( Fig. 94 View Figures 92–97 ); flagellum winding dextrad ( Fig. 93 View Figures 92–97 ), strongly projecting from apical lobes ventrally ( Figs 38 View Figures 35–41 , 92 View Figures 92–97 ); lateral lobes reduced, marked by unequal groups of setae ( Figs 93, 94 View Figures 92–97 ); ventral lobe broad, subquadrate, with truncate apex ( Figs 38 View Figures 35–41 , 92 View Figures 92–97 ), in ventral view narrow, strongly shifted sinistrad ( Fig. 93 View Figures 92–97 ); transverse ridge of median foramen concave ( Fig. 93 View Figures 92–97 ), strongly projecting ventrally ( Figs 38 View Figures 35–41 , 92 View Figures 92–97 ).
Female: Sperm pump with chamber abruptly narrowed at transition point towards bursal duct ( Fig. 168 View Figures 163–172 ); bursal duct about three times as long as sperm pump; bursa membranous ( Fig. 167 View Figures 163–172 ).
Phylogeny: Scopaeus cuspilobatus is a member of the S. gracilis species group ( Frisch et al. 2002: 39).
Distribution: Scopaeus cuspilobatus is hitherto known only from the type locality in Jawa Barat.
Etymology: The epithet cuspilobatus [adjective, Latin, composed of the noun cuspis (sting, thorn, spine) and lobatus (indicating a characteristic/feature of the lobe)] refers to the distinct, ventral spine of the dextral apical lobe of the aedeagus of this new species ( Figs 38 View Figures 35–41 , 83 View Figures 80–85 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |