Gusicella minima ( Henson, 1948 ) SCHLAGINTWEIT & RASHIDI, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.35463/j.apr.2021.02.01 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B887C2-2B48-4E6F-FCAC-D6B8B71ADA5C |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Gusicella minima ( Henson, 1948 ) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Gusicella minima ( Henson, 1948) View in CoL comb. nov.
Figs. 2 View Fig c-d, 7-9
*1948 Dictyoconella minima n. sp. – Henson, p. 25, pl. 11, fig. 3, 8-10.
1998 Dictyoconella minima Henson – Whittaker et al., pl. 4, fig. 3, pl. 5, figs. 1-2, pl. 48, figs. 1-4.
2008 Dictyoconella minima Henson – Schlagintweit et al., p.34, fig. 3a-b pars, 5-6.
Description: Test medium conical (apical angle from 50 to 90 degrees); both sides and cone base slightly convex. Assumed microspheric specimens broader and larger ( Fig. 8a View Fig , 9a, 9f, 9j View Fig ). Transverse sections circular ( Fig. 8p View Fig ) or ovoidal-compressed ( Fig. 7l View Fig , 8j View Fig ). The initial part is characterized by a small spire of few chambers arranged in half a whorl that is closely attaching (almost parallel) to the side test wall ( Fig. 7d, g, i View Fig , 9b View Fig ). The acute apex is tilted, marking the early development in a downwards turning to the cone base (e.g. Fig. 7g View Fig ). The megalospheric embryo appears as a single subspherical chamber (protoconch) showing short septules at its upper part facing the cone base ( Fig. 7 View Fig g-i). The chambers are subdivided into marginal and central zones. The exoskeleton consists of horizontal (rafters) and radial vertical partitions (beams) subdividing the chamber margins. There are one to three rafters in the marginal zone (e.g. Fig. 7e View Fig ). In case of two rafters, the upper one (in direction to the apex) is twice as long as the lower one. In case of three rafters, the middle one is roughly twice as long as the others. There are two to three intercalary beams between the longer main partitions (beams) ( Fig. 8p View Fig , 9d View Fig ). The latter are continuous from one chamber to the next ( Fig. 8c, 8m View Fig , 9i View Fig ). They extend to the undivided marginal through marking the boundary to the central zone ( Fig. 7a View Fig , 9d View Fig ). Here, the septa slightly bend upwards in direction to the apex forming a “buttress on marginal ridge” sensu Davies (1930) as seen in axial sections ( Fig. 8k View Fig ). Shallow-tangential sections display a pattern of subrounded alveolar compartments (subepidermal network) ( Fig. 7j View Fig , 8f View Fig , 9e View Fig ). At their distal ends the primary beams are moderately thickening. The marginal chamberlets are tapering distally terminating inwards with a marginal foramen, oriented at about 45 degrees to the main axis. In transverse sections they form a circular ring ( Fig. 7l View Fig , 8k, 8o View Fig ). Foramina can form a continuous line running parallel to the outer test surface as seen in axial sections ( Fig. 7e View Fig , 8a View Fig ). Certain portions of the central zone are filled with opaque micritic masses (fused pillars and/or secondary deposits) that obliterate the original structure ( Fig. 7 View Fig b-c, 8h). The pillars of the central zone are comparably narrowly spaced and alternate between consecutive chambers ( Fig. 7 View Fig c-d, 8a, h, 9f). In the central part, the foramina present a cribrate distribution and are vertically arranged.
Dimensions (in mm; data from Henson, 1948, between brackets):
Test diameter (D): 0.7–1.9 mm (0.7–1.8 mm). Note: specimens with a test diameter> 1.5 mm appear to be miscrospheric specimens.
Test height (H): 0.8–1.4 (1.0– 1.5 mm)
D/H: 0.8–1.35
Numbers of chambers per 1 mm of the axial length: 12– 16, mostly 15–16 (15)
Remarks on stratigraphy: Henson (1948) reported D. minima “most probably” from the late Cenomanian or Turonian of Qatar (Dukhan no. 2 and 3 wells; Wasia Group, see figs. 1-2 in Sugden and Standring, 1975). In addition, Henson (op. cit, p. 26) noted “a single specimen, possibly of this species” from the Maastrichtian of Iraq. For the Dukhan oil field of Qatar, Hewaidy and Al-Hitmi (1994) established a Late Cenomanian “ Dictyoconella minima total range Zone”. The “zonal taxon” however, has not been illustrated and therefore, cannot be commented. Within the framework of our observations in the Cenomanian Sarvak Formation of Iraq (e.g. Yazdi-Moghadam and Schlagintweit, 2020), no specimens of G. minima have been observed. There are specimens of an orbitolinid displaying a pillared central zone and a complex exoskeleton that needs further taxonomic study and evaluation, and it is different from G. minima . So far, only the occurrence in the Maastrichtian is well constrained and older occurrences require further study.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.