Neaneflus Linsley, 1957
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7399054 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:08BF4EE0-E69C-4E09-BECA-26481D49BFDE |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7399383 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B887C8-FFC7-FFE2-FF45-0EA3FB9D9748 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Neaneflus Linsley, 1957 |
status |
|
Neaneflus Linsley, 1957 View in CoL
( Fig. 17 View Figure 17 , 18 View Figure 18 )
Neaneflus Linsley 1957: 19 View in CoL .
Type species. Elaphidion fuchsii Wickham, 1905 View in CoL . Original designation.
Discussion. The genus Neaneflus was proposed by Linsley (1957) based on the single species, Elaphidion fuchsii Wickham (1905) , described from the Mojave Desert in California. This species was distinguished from other genera of Elaphidiini , especially Aneflus and Aneflomorpha , in having the procoxal cavities widely open, the outer antennal flagellomeres not or vaguely carinate, and the elytra rounded apicolaterally. Chemsak (1962) subsequently described N. brevispinus , which is synonymized with Aneflomorpha opacicornis herein. Linsley (1963) stated that “the robust form and broadly expanded, not or only vaguely carinate antennae will distinguish it from Aneflomorpha .”
Since some of these character states (widely open procoxal cavities, elytral apices rounded apicolaterally, and antennae vaguely carinate) are present in some Aneflomorpha , Neaneflus in this work is further diagnosed as having antennae that are covered with a vestiture of very short, erect setae throughout and nearly lacking longer recumbent setae and the pronotum that is as wide as or wider than long. Specimens of N. fuchsii (females of N. opacicornis not known) present striking sexual dimorphism in the antennal length and form to a degree not seen in other Elaphidiini which may serve as another character defining Neaneflus .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Neaneflus Linsley, 1957
Lingafelter, Steven W. 2022 |
Neaneflus
Linsley EG 1957: 19 |