Protrechina Wilson, 1985
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1111/syen.12522 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:016059BA-33C3-43B2-ADAD-6807DC5CB6D8 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6303224 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B987A9-4366-FF97-FCC0-FAA2FEA5D90E |
treatment provided by |
Tatiana |
scientific name |
Protrechina Wilson |
status |
|
On the identity of † Protrechina Wilson View in CoL :
Wilson (1985) described a genus putatively close to Paratrechina sensu lato (∼ Prenolepis genus group) from mid-Eocene Claiborne amber (Arkansas, 40.4–37.2 Ma; Saunders et al., 1974). This genus, † Protrechina , supposedly differs from Paratrechina s. l., Lepisiota Santschi and Brachymyrmex Mayr – among other, unstated formicines – by the absence of standing macrosetae on the mesosomal dorsum, a state similar to that observed for Metalasius gen.nov. as noted below. The genus has been variably treated as a lasiine ( Bolton, 1994, 1995; LaPolla & Dlussky, 2010), a ‘prenolepidine’ ( Hölldobler & Wilson, 1990), or as incertae sedis in the subfamily where it remains at present ( Wilson, 1985; Dlussky & Fedoseeva 1988; Bolton, 2003; Ward et al., 2016). The type specimen of † Protrechina carpenteri Wilson , at the Museum of Comparative Zoology (Harvard), should be reexamined to evaluate its tribal, and perhaps generic, placement. This would be particularly valuable given the approximately mid-Eocene origin of the Prenolepis genus group here inferred ( Fig. 4 View Fig ; Table 5); such a study will be facilitated by use of micro-CT (e.g., Hita-Garcia et al., 2017; Barden et al., 2017b; Boudinot et al., in press), given the poor condition of the specimen reported by LaPolla & Dlussky (2010).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |