Echinops ceratophorus Boiss.
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/adansonia2022v44a7 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6323824 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B987B8-5527-FFAB-2200-FB59B1B3FE6B |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Echinops ceratophorus Boiss. |
status |
|
Echinops ceratophorus Boiss. View in CoL View at ENA
( Fig. 1 View FIG )
Diagnosis Plantarum Orientalium Novarum 1 (6): 100 ( Boissier 1846).
Echinops villosissimus Bunge var. glutinosissimus Parsa , Kew Bulletin 3 (2): 208 ( Parsa 1948). — Holotype: Iran. Fars Province, prope Shiraz , 15.VI.1885, O. Stapf 1695 (holo-, K[ K000768891 ]!) .
Echinops farsicus Rech. f. View in CoL , Oesterreichische Botanische Zeitschrift 97: 245 ( Rechinger 1950). — Holotype: Iran. Fars Province, Kuh Tschah Siah , an der Pistaziengrenze , 16.VII.1885, O. Stapf 1276 (holo-, WU[ WU0060105 ]!) View Materials .
LECTOTYPE (here designated). — Iran. Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province: ad radices Kuh Delu prope Deremgun , 17.VI.1842, Th. Kotschy 548 (lecto-, G [ G00765429 ]! ; isolecto-, FI [ FI006558 ]!, G [ G00223648 , G00223649 (two sheets comprising one specimen)]!, H [ H1052030 ]!, K [ K000768890 ]!, L [ L3680430 ]!, MO [ MO-714042 ]!, P [ P00711511 , P00711514 ]!, W [ W18890072845 , W0022362 , W0022363 , W0022364 ]!, WAG [ WAG0000565 ]!) .
REMARKS
Fifteen herbarium specimens of the type of Echinops ceratophorus were found at FI, G, H, K, L, MO, P, W, and WAG, which have to be treated as syntypes (art. 40 note 1 of Turland et al. 2018). According to McNeill (2014), the existence of a holotype cannot be established in this case because there was more than one specimen for this species, housed in more than one institution. The specimen G00765429 is selected here as the lectotype, because it clearly shows the characters mentioned in the protologue.
Rechinger (1950) described Echinops farsicus as a new species from Kuh Tschah Siah (Fars Province) for Iran. Twenty nine years later, Rechinger (1979) placed E. farsicus to synonymy of E. ceratophorus . As no morphological differences between both species can be seen, Rechinger’s treatment is followed here.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Echinops ceratophorus Boiss.
Negaresh, Kazem 2022 |
Echinops farsicus
Rech. f. 1950: 245 |
Echinops villosissimus Bunge var. glutinosissimus
Parsa 1948: 208 |