Palaeotinca sp. 1

Schulz-Mirbach, Tanja & Reichenbacher, Bettina, 2006, Reconstruction of Oligocene and Neogene freshwater fish faunas-an actualistic study on cypriniform otoliths, Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 51 (2), pp. 283-304 : 298-299

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.13643922

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B987C7-FFF1-3C24-FCBF-0F6EFDA47EB6

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Palaeotinca sp. 1
status

 

Palaeotinca sp. 1

Fig. 28 View Fig .

1996 “genus Cyprinidarum” sp.; Reichenbacher and Mödden 1996: 91, pl. 1: A–M.

2004 cf. Tarsichthys sp. ; Reichenbacher 2004, pro parte: 118, pl. 3: 1–2.

Material, dimensions and stratigraphic range.—See Tables 1 and 4, and Fig. 32 View Fig .

Description.—The general shape, the prominent anterolateral and anteromedial edges, the well developed mineralization area, and the cranial umbo make these lapilli similar to Palaeotinca moeddeni sp. nov., but the concavity of the posterior margin is absent, the medial margin is more or less straight, and the most thickened portion lies anteriorly. However, there is some similarity to Tinca micropygoptera from the Steinheim Basin (see Gaudant 1989, here Fig. 29 View Fig ).

Remarks.—The numerous pharyngeal fish teeth from St. Donat all belong to the genus Palaeotinca (det. Jean Gaudant and Madelaine Böhme) and support our attribution of the otoliths. These teeth were erroneously mentioned as Tarsichthys in Reichenbacher (2004). No fish teeth were available from Göllheim.

Palaeotinca sp. 1 reveals a rather high variability in both localities. Some specimens are wider and reveal a more trapezoid posterior portion instead of the pointed posterior end (e.g., Fig. 28A, B View Fig ). However, intermediate forms are also present and thus we do not separate these morphotypes. The observed variability may relate to the brackish conditions and shifting salinities in both localities.

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF