Pomacea reevei, Ampuero & Ramírez, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5258.1.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A1F9480B-267D-4CBD-8159-00FD9A6445A4 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7775898 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B98B27-BC0C-FF9F-FF10-17B6FDABF980 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Pomacea reevei |
status |
sp. nov. |
Pomacea reevei View in CoL sp. nov.
Figs. 4C, 4D View FIGURE 4 , 5B View FIGURE 5 , 6B, 6D View FIGURE 6 , 7B, 7C, 7E View FIGURE 7 , 10D, 10E, 10F, 10G View FIGURE 10 , 12 View FIGURE 12 , 13 View FIGURE 13 , 14 View FIGURE 14 , 15 View FIGURE 15 , 16E View FIGURE 16
Synonymy: Pomacea sp. 1 — Ramírez et al. 2022, fig 2E.
Types: PERU. Holotype male MUSM 5723H . GoogleMaps Paratypes: MUSM 5723P , MZSP 122666 View Materials (ex MUSM 5723P ), SMF 348817 About SMF (ex MUSM 5723P ), LORETO, Maynas prov., Kichwa Cocha, near Napo River , Rango Isla populated center, 2°21'42.55''S 73°52'11.27''W, leg. R. Chujutalli & & S. Perez, 18/viii/2022, 7 specimens; GoogleMaps MUSM 5716P , LORETO, Maynas prov., Pucayacu, near Napo River , 2°12'13.26''S 74°5'11.55''W, leg. R. Chujutalli, 29/xi/2018, 5 specimens; GoogleMaps MUSM 5715 P, LORETO, Maynas prov., Puerto Alegre near Lagartococha , Napo River , 2°37'20''S 73°31'40.1''W, leg. R. Chujutalli, 17/viii/2017, 5 specimens; GoogleMaps MUSM 5720P , LORETO, Alto Amazonas prov., Cocha Naranjillo near Huallaga River , Naranjal community, 5°13'27,56''S 70°54'32.1''W, leg. J. Sucumbio et al. 06/iii/2020, 5 specimens; GoogleMaps MUSM 5724P , LORETO, Ucayali prov., Hermanos Lake, near Cruz Muyuna Lake , Ucayali River . 6°44'31.8''S 75°01'40.1''W, leg. R. Chujutalli, 05/iii/2022, 1 specimen; GoogleMaps MUSM 5719P , LORETO, Alto Amazonas prov., Shirui Cocha near Huallaga River , Naranjal community, 5°13'29.58''S 75°40'21.58''W, leg. J. Sucumbio, et al. 27/v/2019, 1 specimen; GoogleMaps MUSM 5627P , MADRE DE DIOS, Tambopata prov., Chacra Gamitana station, near Madre de Dios River , 12°30'05.7''S 68°58'34.2''W, A. Ampuero et al., 17/vi/2011, 4 specimens; GoogleMaps MUSM 5718P , LORETO, Maynas prov., Bandeja Isla in Monte Verde oxbow, near Napo River , 2°8'2.78''S 74°13'16.91''W, leg. R. Chujutalli & G. Monchoa, 21/xii/2019, 4 specimens GoogleMaps .
Etymology: The specific epithet of the type species is in honor of the English malacologist Lovell Augustus Reeve, who contributed with several illustrated works in malacology.
Additional material examined: PERU. MUSM 5634 , UCAYALI, Purus prov., Oxbow Lake near Cocha San Marcos , 9°53'47.9''S 70°51'69.5''W, 28/vii/2010, 4 shells; MUSM 5633 , GoogleMaps UCAYALI, Purus prov., Alto Purús River: Esperanza Surveillance Post , Cocha San Marcos , 9°53'48''S 70°51'69.5''W, leg. F. Chang, 09/vii/1994, 1 shell; GoogleMaps MUSM 5635 , UCAYALI, Purus prov., Cocha Livia , 9°56'58.2''S 70°54'32.1''W, 25/vii/2010, 8 shells; GoogleMaps MUSM 5632 , UCAYALI, Purus prov., Miguel Grau, Cocha Grau near Curanja River , 09°57'S 70°59''W, leg. F. Chang, 08/ix/1994, 1 shell; GoogleMaps MUSM 5629 , MADRE DE DIOS, Tambopata prov., Cocha Camp in Cuzco Amazonico-Biotrop (Inkaterra), Madre de Dios River , 12°35'S 69°05'W, R. Ramírez, 30/iv/1991, 3 shells GoogleMaps ; MUSM 5722 , MADRE DE DIOS, Tambopata prov., ITA Inkaterra, Madre de Dios River , 12°32'04.9''S 69°02'50.8''W, leg. W. Ruiz, 23/xii/2017, 10 shells GoogleMaps ; MUSM 5631 , MADRE DE DIOS, Tambopata prov., Miraya temporary lake, Palma Real River , ca. Palma Real Control Post , Palma Real Community , 12°30'59.1''S 68°48'44.3''W, leg. H. Ortega, 28/vii/1995, 2 shells GoogleMaps ; MUSM 5628 , MADRE DE DIOS, Tambopata prov., Oxbow Lake near Valencia Lake , 12°28'11.9''S 68°47'32.8''W, A. Ampuero et al., 17/vi/2011, 1 shell. GoogleMaps
Mitochondrial COI sequences are deposited into GenBank under the accession numbers MZ351319–MZ351332, as well as 16S rRNA MZ354652–MZ354656.
Type locality ( Fig. 2D View FIGURE 2 ): PERU. LORETO, Maynas prov., Kichwa Cocha, near Napo River , Rango Isla populated center (2°21'42.55''S 73°52'11.27''W) GoogleMaps .
Diagnosis: Grey penis sheath wide with bulged tip. Penis sheath gland in the apical region, occupying the entire bulged tip and with a small notch.
Shell ( Fig. 12 View FIGURE 12 ): Shell large (81–137 mm), globose, thin, some specimens with thick shells, with 5.3 to 5.6 whorls. Periostracum yellowish to chestnut; Sculpture similar to previous species. Spire slightly elevated to depressed, with a deeply sutural channel. Aperture wide and ovate. Interior cream to white; specimens from Madre de Dios and Purus basins with notorious dark spiral bands. Outer lip light brown to white, and as in the previous character, southern specimens different due to the presence of dark spots in outer lip. Umbilicus narrow and deep. Measurements in mm. Holotype, height: 114.10, width: 93.28, aperture height: 90.22, aperture width: 60.18. N=181, (average±standard deviation, minimum–maximum) height: 102.7±21.6, 72.6–207.7; width: 85.8±19.5, 59.7–185.4; aperture height: 81.8±16.2, 60.1–164.2; aperture width: 54.4±12.9, 37.1–120.7.
Operculum ( Figs. 4C, 4D View FIGURE 4 ): Features similar to P. penai with the following remarks. Operculum ovate semicircular, covering ~2/3 of aperture. Concentric grooves in outer surface, with mesomarginal nucleus. Smooth inner surface. Elliptical insertion mark occupying ~2/3 of internal area.
External anatomy ( Figs. 5B View FIGURE 5 , 13B View FIGURE 13 ): Characters similar to P. penai with the following differences. Dark grey to black foot. Sole grey. Long cephalic tentacles. Short and broad ommatophores with dark eyes. Snout broad and elongated, with lateral labial palps, with ~2/3 of length of cephalic tentacles. Elongated siphon. Glandular furrow, occupying ~2/3 of anterior pedal margin. Broad and short columellar muscle, covering ~1/5 of the body whorl.
Mantle cavity ( Figs. 6B View FIGURE 6 , 13A, 13C View FIGURE 13 ): Similar characters of mantle to those of P. penai sp. nov. with following characters. Cavity ( Figs. 6B View FIGURE 6 , 13A View FIGURE 13 ) occupying almost half of body whorl. Osphradium ( Fig. 13C View FIGURE 13 ) in left side of cavity, posterior to border, comprised laterally, with curved posterior region. Base of osphradium, wide and slightly elevated at anterior region. Lung sac elongated and trapezoidal, occupying ~3/5 of mantle cavity, with thick muscular walls. Ctenidial vein between gill and lung sac, thickening near pericardium region. Ctenidial filaments slender and long with tip slightly curved to left.
Circulatory and excretory systems ( Figs. 6B View FIGURE 6 , 13A, 13D View FIGURE 13 ): Similar to those described for previous species, with following remarkable attributes. Pericardium cavity ( Fig. 13A View FIGURE 13 ) wide. Auricle broad. Ventricle pyramidal. Posterior kidney ( Fig. 13D View FIGURE 13 ) slightly concave and vascularized, broad, with anterior region slightly curved with blunt tip. Anterior kidney elongated and triangular.
Digestive system ( Figs. 6D View FIGURE 6 , 7B, 7C, 7E View FIGURE 7 , 13A, 13E, 13F View FIGURE 13 ): Structures similar to those of P. penai sp. nov. Buccal bulb spherical and broad ( Figs 6D View FIGURE 6 , 13E View FIGURE 13 ). Radula (N=3) with same configuration as previous species with the following differences: with ~26–41 rows ( Figs 7B, 7C, 7E View FIGURE 7 ). Rachidian tooth rectangular with slightly concave base and lateral margins; central cusp broad and rounded; lateral cusps rounded and of ~2/11 length of central peak. Lateral teeth, with triangular central cusp, and minuscule outer lateral cusps around it. Inner marginal teeth with two tiny triangular cusps, internal cusp of ~2/11 length of outer cusp. Pair of salivary glands compact ( Figs 6D View FIGURE 6 , 13E View FIGURE 13 ), lateral to digestive tract. Esophageal pouches adjacent to esophagus slender and short. Gastric muscle broad and long ( Fig. 13F View FIGURE 13 ). Septum lingulate and elevated. Proximal region of major typhlosole with elongated fold. Minor typhlosole origin with developed fold at margin of stomach pouch. Sorting area of same proportion as P. penai sp. nov. Elongated and wide intestinal caeca.
Reproductive system: Female ( Figs. 6B View FIGURE 6 , 13A View FIGURE 13 ). Structures resembling previous species with the following differences. Ovary ivory, with several separated acini joining and forming the visceral oviduct. Seminal receptacle ( Fig. 13A View FIGURE 13 ) elongated. Parenchymal tissue of albumen gland-capsule gland complex orange colored. Albumen gland lumen expanded. Vagina broad ( Figs. 6B View FIGURE 6 , 13A View FIGURE 13 ), with thick walls, adjacent to right side of mantle cavity, beneath a short urinary gutter. Female opening wide.
Male ( Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 ). Visceral structures similar to previous species. Testis cream, occupying approximately first 3 1/2 whorls. Slender spermiduct in the basal region of the testis, over pericardium region. Seminal vesicle globose and reniform ( Fig. 14C View FIGURE 14 ). Prostate elongated with a strong curvature at the proximal region, running adjacent to rectum, and beneath urinary gutter in its distal portion. Prostate inserted below anal papilla. Penis pouch ( Figs. 14A, 14B View FIGURE 14 ) massive, containing penis and penis bulb, this latter solid and occupying ~1/2 of penis pouch. Penis cylindrical and thick, abruptly decreasing diameter at distal portion. Penis sheath grey, wide, triangular, slightly curved to the right, and bulged tip. With two glands in right dorsal margin: one in distal region, occupying entire bulged tip and with a small notch; basal gland wrinkled, elongated and subtriangular to trapezoidal, near to sheath base and occupying ~1/3 or less of penis sheath. Basal outer gland embedded in the right region of the sheath, with a pore in the ventral surface.
Eggs ( Figs. 10D, 10E, 10F, 10G View FIGURE 10 ): Clutch (N=3) with spherical eggs, slightly tight disposed; newly hatched white with a slime layer cover, turning with time to a cream color; number of eggs approximately of 300, average egg diameter near 6 mm.
Shell variability ( Fig. 15 View FIGURE 15 ): Geometric morphometric analysis of the shells (N=142) showed most specimens from Madre de Dios basin had a lower spire and expanded aperture. First and second principal component explained 48.65% of the variation. Shape variation across the first principal component showed an expanded aperture relative to a depressed body whorl at the positive end of the axis; towards negative end of axis, shells have elevated body whorls. For the second principal component, shells displayed an elongated aperture and high spire at the end of the negative axis, and an expanded aperture and depressed spire at the positive end of the axis.
Procrustes ANOVA showed highly significant differences among localities (F: 7.2221, p<0.001). Pairwise comparisons also found significant differences among several localities. In particular, Madre de Dios specimens had highly significant differences compared to other localities, except Amazonas (Supplementary Table 1 provides the pairwise results). Other significant pairs were Amazonas / Huallaga , Amazonas / Napo and Napo / Huallaga (p<0.05). axes.
Distribution and habitat: Deep oxbow lakes near Napo, Huallaga, Ucayali, Madre de Dios and Purus Rivers. Fishers usually find them in their fish traps left overnight.
Remarks ( Fig. 16 View FIGURE 16 ): Pomacea reevei sp. nov. matches with the illustration of Delessert (1841:pl. 31, figs. 3a, 3b) as Ampullaria canaliculata (Lamarck, 1822) . This author described the specimen ( Fig. 16A View FIGURE 16 , coded MHNG-MOLL-33489) as a large-shelled individual claiming that it once belonged to Lamarck’s collection. Our concept of P. reevei sp. nov. includes Ampullaria gigas (non Spix in Wagner, 1827) as presented by Reeve (1856:pl. 1, fig. 3) in his Conchologia Iconica. Reeve described it in detail based on shell material (NHMUK 20110205), with type locality of Solomon’s River (possibly referring to Solimıes River, the upper section of Amazon River located in Brazil) ( Fig 16B View FIGURE 16 ). Sowerby (1909) and Alderson (1925) disregarded Delessert specimen as A. canaliculata based on its size, and considered it was Ampullaria gigas (Spix in Wagner, 1827), synonymizing also with A. gigas ( Reeve, 1856) . Later, Pain (1960) proposed A. gigas of Spix and Reeve to be synonyms of P. maculata ( Cowie & Thiengo 2003) . This could be demonstrated by P. reevei sp. nov. specimens in Pain collection housed in Wales Museum (NMW.Z.1981.118.00486; NMW.Z.1981.118.00201) determined as P. maculata ( Figs. 16C, 16D View FIGURE 16 ). We should add that previous authors such as Pain or Alderson described the shell of their P. gigas as thin, a trait present in our material, and did not mention Spix’s holotype, probably as much of his material was lost or destroyed ( Alderson 1925). Hayes et al. (2012) assigned a neotype for P. gigas , and rejected the possible type status of Delessert’s shell arguing that there are still doubts regarding the labelling process of this specimen. Based on observations of collected material for the present research, we propose that the material used by Delessert and Reeve could be P. reevei sp. nov. Likewise, we compared P. reevei sp. nov. with Pomacea maculata described by Hayes et al. (2012). Shells of P. reevei sp. nov. are frequently thin and fragile even in most larger specimens, compared to the thickness of P. maculata . Deeply narrow umbilicus and angled channeled suture are shared with Pomacea crosseana (Hidalgo, 1871) (syntypes examined, MNCN 15.05.1047 and 15.05.11485), where P. reevei had a more prominent and expanded body whorl.
Male reproductive system of P. reevei sp. nov. resembles Pomacea paludosa (Say, 1829) ( Hanning 1979) , but with following exceptions: apical penis sheath gland covers entire sheath tip including the notch, and basal internal gland does not cover most of penis sheath gland. It is noteworthy that in COI phylogeny, P. reevei and P. paludosa were closely related (genetic distance ranged from 13.6–14.3%), although with low support, within P. canaliculata clade; one species of this clade, P. maculata , had a distance of 12.1–12.8% to P. reevei ( Ramírez et al. 2022) . Pomacea reevei sp. nov. could be distinguished from P. maculata and P. canaliculata by possession of its apical penis sheath gland located in the bulged tip, as opposed to enlarged apical gland that occupies more than 1/3 of the penis sheath ( Sachwatkin 1920; Hayes et al. 2012); this character is shared also by Pomacea lineata (Spix, 1827) ( Thiengo 1987) . Penis pouch proportion in P. reevei sp. nov. is similar to Pomacea dolioides ( Reeve, 1856) and differs from this species by its smaller internal penis sheath glands, compared to the developed basal internal gland in P. dolioides ( Tillier 1980) . Kidney of P. reevei sp. nov. has characters similar to those of P. maculata , differing by its anterior broad set of lamellae in anterior kidney, as is present in P. canaliculata ( Hayes et al. 2012) . Ampulla vessels have the same pattern of P. canaliculata ( Hayes et al. 2012) . Regarding eggs, P. reevei shares spherical eggs shape and mucus matrix with P. paludosa ( Snyder & Snyder 1971; Rawlings et al. 2007). Spherical shape also appeared in species from this clade like P. canaliculata , P. maculata and P. lineata ( Thiengo 1987; Cowie et al. 2006; Hayes et al. 2012). Also, P. reevei sp. nov. eggs are characterized by their highest individual average diameter among all described Pomacea species.
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |