Sphyrna sp.

Adnet, Sylvain, Marivaux, Laurent, Cappetta, Henri, Charruault, Anne-Lise, Essid, El Mabrouk, Jiquel, Suzanne, Ammar, Hayet Khayati, Marandat, Bernard, Marzougui, Wissem, Merzeraud, Gilles, Temani, Rim, Vianey-Liaud, Monique & Tabuce, Rodolphe, 2020, Diversity and renewal of tropical elasmobranchs around the Middle Eocene Climatic Optimum (MECO) in North Africa: New data from the lagoonal deposits of Djebel el Kébar, Central Tunisia, Palaeontologia Electronica (a 38) 23 (2), pp. 1-62 : 16

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.26879/1085

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B6B8E985-F1CF-4C10-BB00-602E5BF36C1C

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BA87C1-FFC3-FFD4-C0BB-E25AC915B379

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Sphyrna sp.
status

 

? Sphyrna sp.

Figure 6 View FIGURE 6 D-F

Material. KEB 1-123 to 1-125 ( Figure 6 View FIGURE 6 D-F) consists of 10 upper and lower teeth from the KEB- 1 locality, Souar-Fortuna formations, Djebel el Kebar, Tunisia.

Description

Upper teeth are relatively small (3.5 mm in length). The cusp is relatively fine and high in the mesio-distal axis; the mesial cutting edge is straight ( Figure 6D View FIGURE 6 ) to slightly concave ( Figure 6 View FIGURE 6 EF), and bears fine serrations on its more mesial part, marking sometimes a small notch. The distal heel is well developed, rounded and also finely serrated. The root is broader than the crown, both in antero-lateral ( Figure 6 View FIGURE 6 D-E) and lateral teeth ( Figure 6F View FIGURE 6 ); root lobes are well aligned, horizontal and separated by a straight nutritive groove.

Remarks

Compared with the former described species, a few teeth of small size were provisionally attributed to another species of Sphyrna . The latter, illustrated by upper teeth, presents a dental pattern that reminds those of small individuals of Sphyrna guinoti nov. sp. ( Figure 5A View FIGURE 5 ), except that the crown sometimes shows mesial and distal heels with a short and fine serration. Teeth are moreover more labiolingually compressed and lesser expended mesiodistally compared with those usually reported for S. guinoti nov. sp. Alternatively, they could document to a tooth morphology of juvenile of S. guinoti nov. sp. due to the scarcity of the material, this species was left in open nomenclature.

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF