Coenodomus Walsingham, 1888: 49
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5264.4.9 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A65E722C-C9D8-43DA-9668-D7338CAA55CA |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7844806 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BAA304-FFD0-FFCD-FF0B-4BD0FEDD1E87 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Coenodomus Walsingham, 1888: 49 |
status |
|
Genus Coenodomus Walsingham, 1888: 49 View in CoL
Type species: Coenodomus hockingi Walsingham, 1888 View in CoL , by original designation
= Alippa Aurivillius, 1894 View in CoL (Type species: Alippa anomala Aurivillius, 1894 , by monotypy)
= Dyaria Neumoegen, 1893 View in CoL (Type species: Dyaria singularis Neumoegen, 1893 , by monotypy)
Distribution: India, China, Taiwan (Province of China), Bhutan, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Singapore, Java, USA ( Wang et al. 2017); Borneo ( Sutton et al. 2015).
Diagnosis: The members of genus Coenodomus can be easily recognised on the basis of strongly bipectinate antennae with very long pectination and a long, scaled projection from the scape of the antennae. In male genitalia, Coenodomus is characterised by a broad, ventrally concaved and laterally folded uncus, and valvae with a distinctly elongated and sclerotised costa. The genus is closely similar to the members of genus Orthaga Walker. 1859 , but is distinct by the antennal scape projection, which is almost as long as antennae, and by both the wings bearing patches of thick, raised scales, whereas in Orthaga , the scape projection is shorter and the patches of thick scales on wings are absent.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Coenodomus Walsingham, 1888: 49
Ranjan, Rahul, Singh, Navneet & Kirti, Jagbir Singh 2023 |
Coenodomus
Walsingham, L. 1888: 49 |