Repipta

Martin-Park, Abdiel, Delfín-González, Hugo & Coscarón, María Del Carmen, 2012, Revision of genus Repipta Stål 1859 (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Reduviidae: Harpactorinae) with new species and distribution data, Zootaxa 3501, pp. 1-54 : 51-52

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.213795

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A1555675-3A47-46FA-9DAB-4B5DBDE365B8

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6179640

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BAAC66-C15E-736C-FF6A-7BD65C9F3BC1

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Repipta
status

 

Key to Repipta View in CoL species in the Americas

1 Connexival segments armed with short spines at the outer apical angles ( Fig. 16 View FIGURE 16. A E, F)................................ 2

- Connexival segments unarmed at the outer apical angles....................................................... 8

2 Anterior lobe of pronotum homogeneously pigmented........................................................ 3

- Anterior lobe of pronotum with a coloration pattern.......................................................... 7

3 Connexival spines beginning in segment III; posterior lobe of pronotum homogeneously pigmented.................... 4

- Connexival spines beginning in segment II, III, or IV (if beginning in the segments III and IV, posterior lobe of pronotum with a longitudinal band).................................................................................... 5

4 Submedian carina present ( Fig. 16 View FIGURE 16. A B); small species 7.50–8.30 mm ( Tab. 14 View TABLE 14 )................................................................................................. R. nigrospinosa Martin-Park & Coscarón View in CoL , sp. nov.

- Submedian carina absent; medium species 13.80 mm ( Tab. 8) ( Figs 2 View FIGURE 2 A, 5I)................................................................................................... R. ecuadorensis Martin-Park & Coscarón View in CoL , sp. nov.

5 Spines not beginning in segment II, abdominal width bigger than 2.00 mm........................................6

- Spines in II–VI connexival segments, abdominal width less than 2.50 mm [see description of Stål (1868)] ( Figs 4 View FIGURE 4 A, 7A)...................................................................................... R. spinosa (Fabricius) View in CoL

6 Spines on IV–VI connexival segments; pronotum bigger than 2.60 mm ( Tab. 3 View TABLE 3 ) ( Figs 1 View FIGURE 1 E, 5D).................................................................................................. R. ayelenae Martin-Park View in CoL , sp. nov.

- Spines on III–VI connexival segments; pronotum width less than 2.35 mm ( Figs 3 View FIGURE 3 D, 6I) ( Tab. 16)............................................................................... R. paraguayensis Martin-Park & Coscarón View in CoL , sp. nov.

7 Spines only on segment VI; abdomen with a lateral band on segments III–V ( Figs 4 View FIGURE 4 B, 7B).......................................................................................... R. unispina Martin-Park & Coscarón View in CoL , sp. nov.

- Spines on segment II–VI; abdomen with a lateral band on segments I–IX ( Figs 3 View FIGURE 3 G, 6L)............ R. sexdens (Fabricius) View in CoL

8 Urosternites ventrally with an intersegmental suture pigmented ( Figs 5 View FIGURE 5 L, 7C)...................................... 9

- Urosternites ventrally without an intersegmental suture pigmented.............................................. 12

9 Posterior lobe of pronotum with a pattern and posterior margin lighter........................................... 10

- Posterior lobe of pronotum without a pattern and homogeneously pigmented ( Figs 2 View FIGURE 2 D, 5L)........... R. fuscospinosa Stål View in CoL

10 Posterior lobe of pronotum with other pattern; membrane hyaline brown......................................... 11

- Posterior lobe of pronotum with an inverted “V” pattern reaching humeral and discal spines ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 I, 15B); membrane hyaline transparent.......................................................................... R. taurus (Fabricius) View in CoL

11 Anterolateral angles and collar form an inverted “U” pattern reaching or close to anterior acetabulum ( Fig. 16A View FIGURE 16. A ); scutellum with a dark dot in the principal body ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 E, F); legs homogeneously pigmented...................... R. fuscipes Stål View in CoL

- Anterolateral angles, collar, and scutellum of one color, legs not homogeneously pigmented ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 I, 5H)........................................................................... R. costarrisensis Martin Park & Coscarón View in CoL , sp. nov.

12 Posterior process of scutellum acute ( Fig. 16 View FIGURE 16. A C)............................................................. 13

- Posterior process of scutellum acuminate ( Fig. 16 View FIGURE 16. A D)......................................................... 18

13 Submedian carina visible.............................................................................. 14

- Submedian carina not clearly visble...................................................................... 15

14 Submedian carina beginning in the middle of anterior lobe of pronotum and reaching discal spines of posterior lobe of prono- tum ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 G); species more than 13 mm of length ( Tab. 11 View TABLE 11 ).......... R. hondurensis Martin-Park & Coscarón View in CoL , sp. nov.

- Submedian carina beginning in the middle of anterior lobe of pronotum without reaching the middle of posterior lobe of prono- tum ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 F); species less than 12 mm of length ( Tab. 4 View TABLE 4 ).............. R. brailovskyi Martin-Park & Coscarón View in CoL , sp. nov.

15 Hemelytra surpassing ≤ 0.68 mm the abdomen.............................................................. 16

- Hemelytra surpassing 1.70 mm the abdomen............................................................... 17

16 Posterior lobe of pronotum with a light brown middle narrow longitudinal band; posterior margin of posterior lobe of prono- tum curved; discal spines very short (dentiform) ( Fig. 16 View FIGURE 16. A G)..................................... R. nigronotata Stål View in CoL

- Posterior lobe of pronotum with two dark brown broad longitudinal irregular bands; posterior margin of posterior lobe of pro- notum straight ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 B); discal spines long [see original description of Champion (1899)]........... R. mucosa Champion View in CoL

17 Collar of anterior lobe of pronotum thin ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 F); anterior lobe of pronotum with a light brown longitudinal band ( Fig. 16 View FIGURE 16. A H).............................................................. R. schaeferi Martin-Park & Coscarón View in CoL , sp. nov.

- Collar of anterior lobe of pronotum thick ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 D); anterior lobe of pronotum homogeneously pigmented...... R. antica Stål View in CoL

18 Urosternites laterally with a longitudinal band pattern........................................................ 19

- Urosternites laterally without a band pattern............................................................... 21

19 Segments II–VII with a dark brown longitudinal irregular band; mid-, and hind femora light brown except apically brown; parameres exceeding abdomen ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 B)......................... R. argentinensis Martin-Park & Coscarón View in CoL , sp. nov.

- Different combination from above; mid-, and hind femora with other coloration pattern; parameres not exceeding abdomen...................................................................................................... 20

20 Segments II–V with a dark brown longitudinal band [see original description of Barber (1925)]; mid-, and hind femora light brown with two brown bands beyond the middle and apically ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 A)........................... R. annulipes Barber View in CoL

- Segments II–VIII with a dark brown almost black longitudinal band; mid-, and hind femora brown homogeneously pigmented ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 D)................................................................................ R. lepidula Stål View in CoL

21 Species less than 12.3 mm long ( Tab. 9 View TABLE 9 )................................................................... 22

- Species more than 12.3 mm long ( Tab. 6 View TABLE 6 ).................................................................. 23

22 Posterior lobe of pronotum with an inverted “V” pattern or four bands beginning in the anterior margin and reaching each humeral and discal spines ( Figs 2 View FIGURE 2 B, C, 14A–D).................................... R. flavicans (Amyot & Serville) View in CoL

- Posterior lobe of pronotum with a middle longitudinal band across discal spines ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 G)........................................................................................ R. brasiliensis Martin-Park & Coscarón View in CoL , sp. nov.

23 Antennal segment more than 5.00 mm long ( Tab. 6 View TABLE 6 ); pronotum spines yellowish; posterior margin of posterior lobe red or light red....................................................................... R. coccinea (Herrich-Schaeffer) View in CoL

- Antennal segment I less or equal to 5.00 mm long and different combination from above............................ 24

24 Eyes surpassing inferior margins of head; fore femora red basally and brown apically ( Figs 3 View FIGURE 3 E, 6J).................................................................................. R. ruficorpus Martin-Park & Coscarón View in CoL , sp. nov.

- Eyes not surpassing inferior margins; fore femora dark brown ( Figs 3 View FIGURE 3 C, 6H)......................... R. obscuripes Stål View in CoL

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hemiptera

Family

Reduviidae

SubFamily

Harpactorinae

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF