Loboscelidia bachmaensis, Hisasue & Pham & Mita, 2023

Hisasue, Yu, Pham, Thai-Hong & Mita, Toshiharu, 2023, Taxonomic revision of the genus Loboscelidia Westwood, 1874 (Hymenoptera: Chrysididae: Loboscelidiinae) from Vietnam, European Journal of Taxonomy 887 (1), pp. 1-68 : 7-9

publication ID	https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2023.887.2203
publication LSID	lsid:zoobank.org:pub:788AE14A-0698-4C42-819C-BC2412F76FCA
DOI	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8224860
persistent identifier	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/45AE8FE5-9A36-4E8C-9E81-AD92B60E90D0
taxon LSID	lsid:zoobank.org:act:45AE8FE5-9A36-4E8C-9E81-AD92B60E90D0
treatment provided by	Felipe
scientific name	Loboscelidia bachmaensis
status	sp. nov.

Treatment

Loboscelidia bachmaensis sp. nov.

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:45AE8FE5-9A36-4E8C-9E81-AD92B60E90D0

Figs 4 View Fig , 25A View Fig

Etymology

The species epithet is named after the type locality, “Bạch Mã”.

Type material

Holotype VIETNAM • ♂; Thua Thien Hue Province, Bach Ma NP , 19 km point; 16.192° N, 107.849° E; 3–6 Aug. 2016; T. Mita and Y. Komeda leg.; YPT; VNMN. GoogleMaps

Paratypes VIETNAM • 2 ♂♂; same collection data as for holotype; VNMN GoogleMaps .

Description

Male ( Fig. 4A View Fig )

MEASUREMENTS. Body length 2.7 mm; forewing length 2.7 mm.

HEAD. Head ( Fig. 4B–D View Fig ) 1.5 times as long as high; 1.2 times as long as wide; inner ocular length 0.66 times as long as head width; frontal projection rectangular in frontal view ( Fig. 4B View Fig ); apical margin of frontal projection straight; lower part of frontal projection shorter than upper part ( Fig. 4D View Fig ); frons granulate, finely microstriate ( Fig. 4C View Fig ); frons with low ridge extending from median ocellus along inner orbit of eye ( Fig. 4C View Fig ); spraclypeal area with transverse carinae ( Fig. 4B View Fig ); temple 0.80 times as long as MOD ( Fig. 4C View Fig ); POL 0.8 times as long as MOD; OOL 1.2 times as long as MOD; LOL 0.2 times as long as MOD; behind ocelli without transverse depression ( Fig. 4C View Fig ); cervical expansion convex in lateral view ( Fig. 4D View Fig ); basal part of cervical expansion constricted weakly in dorsal view ( Fig. 4C View Fig ); scape 2.1 times as long as wide; scape with longitudinal grooves; F1 1.4 times as long as wide; F2 1.6 times as long as wide; F11 3.2 times as long as wide; relative length of F1–F11: 1.0: 1.1: 1.2: 1.2: 1.2: 1.2: 1.3: 1.3: 1.3: 1.3: 1.8.

MESOSOMA. Pronotum 0.81 times as long as posterior width of pronotum ( Fig. 4F View Fig ); posterior width of pronotum 1.2 times as wide as anterior width and as wide as head width; dorsolateral surface of pronotum carinate ( Fig. 4A View Fig ); notauli of scutum slightly convergent to posterior, not reaching posterior margin ( Fig. 4F View Fig ); median part of scutellum polished ( Fig. 4E View Fig ); posterior part of scutellum rugose; scrobal sulcus present, weakly depressed ( Fig. 4A View Fig ); metanotum with three ridges; metanotum 0.39 times as long as scutellum ( Fig. 4E View Fig ); propodeal angle weakly developed; propodeum without transverse carina above foramen.

WINGS. Forewing with M curved ( Fig. 4G View Fig ); cu-a 0.37 times as long as R; A extending half of Cu+M; R1 0.67 times as long as R; Rs 2.8 times as long as R.

LEGS. Tibiae smooth; flange on forefemur 0.61 times longer, 0.89 times wider than tubular part of forefemur; flange on foretibia 0.42 times longer, 0.50 times wider than tubular part of foretibia; flange on midfemur 0.76 times longer, 0.70 times wider than tubular part of midfemur; flange on midtibia 0.76 times longer, 0.67 times wider than tubular part of midtibia; hindcoxa dorso-laterally carinate; basal part of hindfemur strongly producing; hindfemur basally stout, apparently wider than distal part; ventral margin of hindfemur flat; outer surface of hindfemur smooth; flange on hindfemur 0.74 times longer, 1.2 times wider than tubular part of hindfemur; outer surface of hindtibia smooth; flange on hindtibia 0.79 times longer, 2.0 times wider than tubular part of hindtibia; hindtarsal claw with tooth reaching ⅓ of hindtarsal claw.

PILOSITY. Lower gena with sparse decumbent simple and cuneate setae ( Fig. 4D View Fig ); scape with sparse decumbent simple and simple setae; pedicel with sparse decumbent cuneate setae; dorsal surface of pronotum with sparse decumbent cuneate setae ( Fig. 4F View Fig ); forefemur with sparse decumbent and suberect simple setae; hindtibia with sparse decumbent cuneate setae.

COLORATION. Body reddish brown; antenna reddish brown; legs reddish brown; flanges yellowish brown; ribbon-like setae white.

Female

Unknown.

Distribution

Vietnam (Central Vietnam) ( Fig. 26 View Fig ).

Remarks

This species closely resembles L. vietnamensis sp. nov. in having the following characteristics: weakly convex cervical expansion, F11 3.0 times as long as wide, and a polished scutellum. However, L. bachmaensis sp. nov. can be distinguished by the following characteristics: frontal projection equal to shorter than upper part in lateral view (longer than above in L. vietnamensis sp. nov.); temple 0.80 times as long as MOD (0.3–0.6 times longer than in L. vietnamensis sp. nov.); POL shorter than MOD (longer than MOD in L. vietnamensis sp. nov.); tooth of hindtarsal claw reaching ⅓ of hindtarsal claw (less than ¼ in L. vietnamensis sp. nov.).