Amblyseius largoensis (Muma)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.24349/acarologia/20214418 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BB8785-E042-6C1A-7DF0-A680FA924D7A |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Amblyseius largoensis (Muma) |
status |
|
Amblyseius largoensis (Muma) View in CoL
Amblyseiopsis largoensis Muma 1955: 266 .
Typhlodromus (Amblyseius) largoensis, Chant 1959: 96 .
Amblyseius (Amblyseialus) largoensis, Muma 1961: 287 View in CoL .
Typhlodromus largoensis, Hirschmann 1962: 2 .
Amblyseius (Amblyseius) largoensis, Ehara 1966: 22 View in CoL .
Amblyseius largoensis, Swirski & Golan 1967: 225 View in CoL ; Moraes et al. 1986: 17, 2004b: 33 ; Chant
& McMurtry 2004: 208, 2007: 78.
Amblyseius magnolia Muma 1961: 289 (synonymy by Denmark & Evans 2011).
Amblyseius sakalava Blommers 1976: 96 View in CoL (synonymy by Ueckermann & Loots 1988).
Amblyseius amtalaensis Gupta 1977: 53 View in CoL (synonymy by Gupta 1986).
Amblyseius largoensis View in CoL belongs to the largoensis View in CoL species group and to the largoensis View in CoL species subgroup. It is widespread in all tropical and subtropical regions of the world and was the most abundant species collected by Moraes et al. (2000) in French Caribbean Islands and as a potential BCA of Raoiella indica Hirst View in CoL in La Réunion Island ( Moraes et al. 2012). Using morphometric analyses of 36 characters, molecular analyses and crossing tests, Navia et al. .
(2014) studied specimens collected in Brazil, La Réunion Island and Trinidad and Tobago to determine whether A. largoensis View in CoL populations from different geographic origins belong to the same taxonomic entity. Though differences in the lengths of some setae were observed,
molecular analyses and crossing experiments indicated that populations from Indian Ocean and America were conspecific. This species was previously recorded from Mauritius Island by
Ferragut and Baumann (2019) and Kreiter and AboShnaf (2020b), from Rodrigues Island by
Kreiter and AboShnaf (2020a) and from Mayotte by Kreiter et al. (2020a) based on males and females records.
World distribution: this species is widely distributed in the tropical and subtropical regions of Africa, America, Asia and the Pacific Islands.
Specimens examined: a single ♂ specimen collected during this study. Dindi, inside the village (567 m aasl, 12°12 ′ 56 ″ S, 44°27 ′ 02 ″ E), 1 ♂ on Manihot esculenta Crantz
(Euphorbiaceae), 29/XI/2018.
Remarks: morphological and morphometric characters and all measurements of the
Anjouan specimen fit well with those given in Zannou et al. (2007) for specimens from Africa,
Navia et al. . (2014) for specimens from Brazil, La Réunion and Trinidad & Tobago, by Ferragut and Baumann (2019) and Kreiter and AboShnaf (2020b) for specimens from Mauritius Island,
by Kreiter and AboShnaf (2020a) for specimens from Rodrigues Island and by Kreiter et al.
(2020a) for specimens from Mayotte Island. Schicha (1981c) has given a detailed description of A. herbicolus (under the name A. deleoni Muma and Denmark). He states that, whereas the male of A. deleoni has been described from Florida by Muma and Denmark (1970), it has not been found on leaf samples taken regularly over 5 years from citrus trees on the central coast of New South Wales ( Schicha 1981c). Similarly, Blommers (1976) failed to observe males in the mass rearing of this species in Madagascar. Ferragut and Baumann (2019), Kreiter et al. (2020d) and Kreiter and AboShnaf (2020b) never recorded a single male among several hundred specimens collected in La Réunion and Mauritius, respectively. Occurrence of males in natural populations of A. herbicolus , a thelytokous species after several author, is questioned.
Amblyseius largoensis is a species also very common in the Islands of Indian Ocean very often recorded in several Islands ( Kreiter and AboShnaf 2020a, b; Kreiter et al. 2020a, b). We consequently consider that the single specimen collected in Anjouan which setae length is in accordance with description of the male of that species, is a male of A. largoensis . But as females were not collected in the same time, a doubt is still existing on the occurrence of that species, which must be confirmed in further more surveys in more locations.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Amblyseius largoensis (Muma)
Kreiter, Serge, Payet, Rose-My & Azali, Hamza Abdou 2021 |
Amblyseius amtalaensis
Gupta S. K. 1977: 53 |
Amblyseius sakalava
Blommers L. 1976: 96 |
Amblyseius largoensis, Swirski & Golan 1967: 225
Moraes G. J. de & McMurtry J. A. & Denmark H. A. & Campos C. B. 2004: 33 |
Moraes G. J. de & McMurtry J. A. & Denmark H. A. 1986: 17 |
Swirski E. & Golan Y. 1967: 225 |
Amblyseius (Amblyseius) largoensis
Ehara S. 1966: 22 |
Typhlodromus largoensis
Hirschmann W. 1962: 2 |
Amblyseius (Amblyseialus) largoensis
Muma M. H. 1961: 287 |
Amblyseius magnolia
Muma M. H. 1961: 289 |
Typhlodromus (Amblyseius) largoensis
Chant D. A. 1959: 96 |
Amblyseiopsis largoensis
Muma M. H. 1955: 266 |