Tatargina (Tatargina) picta (Walker, 1865)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.26515/rzsi/v123/i3/2023/172428 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BB87D3-9D7E-340E-3F14-C15FFE82FD3C |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Tatargina (Tatargina) picta |
status |
|
Tatargina (Tatargina) picta View in CoL (Walker, [1865] 1864): 263
Type-locality: Moulmeine [Mawlamyine: Myanmar]
Material examined: Mizoram: 01 ♂, Serchhip district, Thenzawl , 783 m, 92.7567 E, 23.3209 N, 6-iv-2017, Harsimranjeet Singh leg. (Coll. NZCZSI) GoogleMaps . Nagaland: 01 ♂, Kohima district, Kohima , 1444m, 94.1049 E, 25.6716 N, 23-iv-2017, Harsimranjeet Singh leg. (Coll. NZCZSI) GoogleMaps .
Diagnosis: Externally, Tatargina (T.) picta is closely similar to T. (T.) erythromelaena from Cambodia, but is distinct by the larger black spots of patagium ( Bayarsaikhan et al. 2020). In the male genitalia, T. (T.) picta is distinct by the presence of three processes in the right valva (two in T. (T.) erythromelaena ) and in vesica by the smaller spines (Figure 3). Tatargina (T.) picta is unmistakable from other two Indian species i.e. T. (Hindargina) pannosa and T. (Hindargina) sipahi by the adults having forewing with the ground colour red and six rows of irregular, black margined, grey bands/ patches.
Distribution: India (Kohima (Nagaland), Thenzawl (Mizoram )) (Present Study), Cambodia, China, Taiwan, Japan (Ryukyu Is.), Myanmar, Vietnam, Thailand ( Bayarsaikhan et al. 2020).
Remarks: The Chinese population of T. picta bears six rows of irregular, black-margined grey fascia on the forewing ( Dubatolov 2006: 286, colour plate-6, Figure 1 View Figure 1 ) whereas, the Indian population of T. picta studied from Nagaland and Mizoram have continuous and thick fascia (in form of bands) on the forewing ( Figure 1 View Figure 1 ). In the male genitalia of Indian T. picta , apical and ventral processes of the right valva are longer and narrower (Figure 2), which are shorter in the Chinese T. picta ( Dubatolov 2006: 213, Figure 1 View Figure 1 ). We are considering the differences as a part of population variations. However, further studies on some larger samples, coupled with DNA barcodes may shed more light on the better understanding on the microtaxonomy of T. picta .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |