Neoperlops gressitti Banks, 1939
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4763.3.5 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CE6E98DB-0D3A-4709-ADA0-9BA1378390F0 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3805307 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BC8436-FFD1-C828-FF5A-FA67E270FEA1 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Neoperlops gressitti Banks, 1939 |
status |
|
Neoperlops gressitti Banks, 1939 View in CoL
( Figs. 1–2 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 )
Neoperlops gressitti Banks, 1939 View in CoL — Banks 1939: 445. (original description of the male and female from Guangdong and Jiangxi); Zwick 1984: 175. (comb. rev., redescription of male and female based on types); Sivec et al. 1988: 40. (synopsis); Du et al. 1999: 61 (checklist); Stark & Sivec 2008: 94. (note on possible conspecific with N. cheni View in CoL ); Yang & Li 2018: 32. (catalog); Zhang et al. 2019: 3324. (complete mitochondrial genome from Fujian); DeWalt et al. 2020 (catalog).
Neoperla gressitti View in CoL (Banks, 193)— Illies 1966: 267. (comb. n., catalog).
Material examined. 1 male ( HIST): CHINA, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning City, Wuming County, Liangjiang Town, Neichao village, 23°29.664' N, 108°21.622' E, 230 m, 2014.V.10, G.Q. Wang.
Distribution. China, described from Guangdong and Jiangxi Provinces, on the basis of two males and two females ( Banks 1939), recently reported from Fujian Province ( Zhang et al. 2019) and herein from Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region.
Remarks. Zwick (1984) presented a redescription, including the everted aedeagus of N. gressitti based on type material. The head ocellar pattern and the main aedeagal armatures of the present Guangxi male generally agree with the types, in addition to the identical external terminalia. Slight differences in the aedeagus of the Guangxi male include a larger trapezoidal dorsomedial process in lateral view; in dorsal aspect the process is bilobed ( Figs. 2a View FIGURE 2 , c–f). The basal half of aedeagus in the type seems twisted ( Zwick 1984: fig. 2g). These differences may be due to the preserved condition of the aedeagus. Herein, we present color illustrations of external features and everted aedeagal structures to assist further identification of the species ( Figs. 1–2 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 ). The specimens recently listed from Fujian ( Zhang et al. 2019) may refer to N. huanghuye , described from the same area (Wuyishan). Further molecular studies are needed to confirm identity of the three, apparently closely related species of the gressitti group.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Neoperlops gressitti Banks, 1939
Mo, Raorao, Wang, Guoquan, Li, Weihai & Murányi, Dávid 2020 |
Neoperla gressitti
Illies, J. 1966: 267 |
Neoperlops gressitti
Zhang, G. Q. & Wang, Y. & Cao, J. J. 2019: 3324 |
Yang, D. & Li, W. H. 2018: 32 |
Stark, B. P. & Sivec, I. 2008: 94 |
Du, Y. & Sivec, I. & He, J. 1999: 61 |
Sivec, I. & Stark, B. P. & Uchida, S. 1988: 40 |
Zwick, P. 1984: 175 |
Banks, N. 1939: 445 |