Litophyton legiopolypum ( Verseveldt & Alderslade, 1982 )

Van Ofwegen, Leen P., 2020, The genus Litophyton Forskål, 1775 (Octocorallia: Alcyonacea: Nephtheidae) from Australia, Zootaxa 4764 (1), pp. 1-131 : 59

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4764.1.1

publication LSID

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:53C5289A-156C-4AF1-B84A-73099A332C05

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3803542

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BCB717-231B-FFEA-FF35-862BFB3FF927

treatment provided by

Carolina

scientific name

Litophyton legiopolypum ( Verseveldt & Alderslade, 1982 )
status

 

Litophyton legiopolypum ( Verseveldt & Alderslade, 1982) View in CoL

( Figs. 41 View FIGURE 41 c-d, 42b, 45-46)

Nephthea legiopolypa Verseveldt & Alderslade, 1982: 633 View in CoL , Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 , pl. 7B.

Material examined. Holotype AM G14806 , Great Barrier Reef, west tip of Palfrey Island , on reef slope, depth 4.5-6 m, rubble, sand and corals, 3 November 1975, coll. H.K. Larson no. DFH 75-254; RMNH 12438 , part of holotype, 6 microscope slides; RMNH 14722 , Australia, Lizard Island , 30-40 feet, 7 microscope slides; NTM C200 , Queensland, Great Barrier Reef, off Cairns , December 1976, coll. P. Alderslade; NTM C566-567 , March 1978, coll. D. Schubot; NTM C713-714, March 1978, coll. D. Schubot; NTM C11054 , Queensland, Great Barrier Reef, Elford reef, depth 6 m, 10 November 1989, coll. B. Bowden.

Remarks. For a description see Verseveldt & Alderslade (1982). Although these authors depicted a polyp with projecting supporting bundle, the current study indicates that this is not the case for all the polyps. Here I present SEM images of the sclerites of NTM C11054 ( Fig. 45 View FIGURE 45 ) and the polyp armature of the holotype as given by Verseveldt & Alderslade ( Fig. 42b View FIGURE 42 ).

Apparently the base of the holotype was missing, therefore other material shows different sclerites in this part of the colony; shorter spindles in the interior which may have side branches ( Fig. 45k View FIGURE 45 ).

NTM C713 and NTM C714 ( Figs. 41 View FIGURE 41 c-d, 46) are somewhat different from the other material, the polyps have more spindles instead of scales ( Fig. 46b View FIGURE 46 ). The depicted stalk sclerites of NTM C713 are sampled somewhat above the base of the colony, the presented interior stalk sclerites are less branched and somewhat longer ( Fig. 46j View FIGURE 46 ). The sclerites of these specimens resemble NTM C2939 and NTM C10003 of L. brewerensis ( Fig. 44h View FIGURE 44 ), but differ in the tuberculation of the interior stalk spindles, being much coarser in L. legiopolypum .

The species should not be confused with L. mollis as that species has not so many internal stalk spindles with side branches, no projecting supporting bundles, and more spindles in the polyp body than L. legiopolypum .

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Cnidaria

Class

Anthozoa

Order

Alcyonacea

Family

Nephtheidae

Genus

Litophyton

Loc

Litophyton legiopolypum ( Verseveldt & Alderslade, 1982 )

Van Ofwegen, Leen P. 2020
2020
Loc

Nephthea legiopolypa

Verseveldt & Alderslade 1982: 633
1982
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF