Litophyton, Forskal, 1775
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4764.1.1 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:53C5289A-156C-4AF1-B84A-73099A332C05 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3803596 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BCB717-2364-FF96-FF35-837BFDA3FE46 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Litophyton |
status |
|
Key to the species of Litophyton View in CoL group IV (3 species)
(polyp stalk without small rods)
1. Polyps with strongly developed sclerites................................................................ L. grandis View in CoL
-. Polyps with less strongly developed sclerites.................................................................... 2
2. Big wide interior spindles (> 1 mm long) with very regular tubercles........................................ L. carnatum View in CoL
-. Small slender interior spindles (<1 mm long); opaque polyp sclerites................................................ 3
3. Spindles with blunt ends present in interior of the base of the stalk.......................................... L. oxleyensis View in CoL
-. No spindles with blunt ends...................................................................... L. pandoraensis View in CoL
Remarks. As the polyps of L. oxleyensis mostly have scales it also fits group III, where it was described.
L. compactum ( Verseveldt, 1966) , described from Indonesia, falls in this group ( Figs. 42 View FIGURE 42 g-h, 56b, 57). It has similar tuberculated interior stalk sclerites as L. carnatum but they are only about 1 mm long in L. compactum . It differs from L. pandoraensis by having the tuberculation of the interior stalk sclerites much finer, and from L. grandis , which has much stronger developed point sclerites.
L. elongatum ( Kükenthal, 1895) ( Ternate, Indonesia) resembles L. compactum but because of a large amount of detritus attached to the colony the polyp sclerite arrangement could not be drawn. However, the colony and sclerites are presented ( Fig. 56c View FIGURE 56 , 58 View FIGURE 58 ). The most obvious difference is the presence of long rods ( Fig. 58d View FIGURE 58 ), which are not from the polyp stalk but are polyp spindles.
L. pyramidalis ( Kükenthal, 1895) ( Ternate, Indonesia) ( Figs. 56d View FIGURE 56 , 59 View FIGURE 59 ) shows sclerites similar to those of L. elongatum and therefore I here synonymize it with L. elongatum ( Kükenthal, 1895) . Especially the smooth spindles from the interior of the top of the stalk are strikingly similar in both species ( Figs. 58g View FIGURE 58 , 59h View FIGURE 59 ). The polyp sclerite arrangement of L. pyramidalis could be drawn ( Fig. 59a View FIGURE 59 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.