Gnaphosa gracilior Kulczyński, 1901
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3894.1.4 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:70B9B045-9C14-47B1-B0C7-8DDA09AFE02B |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5612632 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BD87E1-FFBD-DB6F-F2C0-3C581EC9FE35 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Gnaphosa gracilior Kulczyński, 1901 |
status |
|
Gnaphosa gracilior Kulczyński, 1901 View in CoL
Figs 79–89, 90 View FIGURES 79 – 85 View FIGURES 86 – 91 .
Gnaphosa gracilior: Ovtsharenko et al. 1992: 49 View in CoL , figs 169–170, 173–176 (♂♀); Marusik & Logunov 1995: 188, figs 40–46 (♂♀); Song et al. 1999: 448, figs 260P, 261D (♂♀); Song et al. 2004: 97, figs 54A–D (♂♀). For a complete synonym listing and references see Platnick (2014)
Material examined. MONGOLIA, Omnogov Aimag: 6♂, 9♀ ( IBPN), Bayandalai Somon, Zoolen uul (Mt. Range), 43°21’N 103°11’E, 1700 m, 27– 30.05.1997 (Yu.M. Marusik); ♂ ( IBPN), Omnogov Aimak, Noyon Somon, Noyon uul (Mt. Range), 1900 m, 30– 31.05.1997 (Yu.M. Marusik). Bayankongor Aimag: 4♂ ( IBPN), Gervanbulag Somon, Knokh-Nuur (Lake), 47°32’N 98°32’, 2600 m, 7– 10.06.1997 (Yu.M. Marusik).
Comments. It is worth mentioning that the figures of epigynes of G. gracilior in Ovtsharenko et al. (1992: figs 170 and 175) undoubtedly refer to two different species. Figure 175 ( Fig. 90 View FIGURES 86 – 91 in this paper) looks like a figure of the syntype female of G. potanini Simon, 1895 ( Fig. 91 View FIGURES 86 – 91 ), while figure 170 ( Fig. 89 View FIGURES 86 – 91 ) is similar to females illustrated in this paper ( Figs 86–87 View FIGURES 86 – 91 ). The species illustrated in Figs 90–91 View FIGURES 86 – 91 have a thinner scape with an undivided pocket and long lateral margins reaching the scape, while in the species illustrated by Figs 86–89 View FIGURES 86 – 91 , the scape is much wider, its pocket partly subdivided and lateral margins not reaching level of scape.
Gnaphosa gracilior has considerable variation in body size, and also in size of epigyne and palp (cf. Figs 82–83 and 84 View FIGURES 79 – 85 ).
Notes. The syntype of Gnaphosa potanini ( Fig. 91 View FIGURES 86 – 91 ), thought to be a holotype, was illustrated by Marusik & Logunov (1995: fig 37). According to Simon (1895) all type specimens (syntypes) were collected in Western Mongolia (“Valleo de Dserge et rive merid. du lac Chara ussu (7– 12.04.1877); Udsjur (Mingyn) au Gobi (24.06.1877)”) and the south part of Russian Altai (“sources de la riviere Toshongty au vesant occ. du Sailugem (14.06.1879)”). Three localities lie west of 94°E (Map 2, closed circles), but in Ovtsharenko et al. (1992) the distribution map (Map 12) and “material examined” indicates its occurrence exclusively east of Anhui (east of 116°E) to Japan (Map 2, open circles). So, G. potanini sensu Ovtsharenko et al. (1992) is most likely misidentified and therefore G. silvicola Kamura, 1988 , considered by Ovtsharenko et al. (1992) as a junior synonym of G. potanini , is a valid name.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Gnaphosa gracilior Kulczyński, 1901
Marusik, Yuri M. & Omelko, Mikhail M. 2014 |
Gnaphosa gracilior:
Song 2004: 97 |
Song 1999: 448 |
Ovtsharenko 1992: 49 |