Anisopodus argus Bates, 1872

Vlasak, Josef, Santos-Silva, Antonio & Nascimento, Francisco Eriberto De L., 2020, Two new species, transference, notes, and new record in South American Acanthocinini (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Lamiinae), Zootaxa 4779 (3), pp. 355-366 : 356

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4779.3.4

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7BCDE4F1-B861-4C60-8482-DBD92ED6931E

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3851739

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BE142A-FFC1-CD0F-FF4F-2435DF30F3B6

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Anisopodus argus Bates, 1872
status

 

Anisopodus argus Bates, 1872 View in CoL , return to original combination

( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 1–12. 1–7 )

Anisopodus argus Bates, 1872: 216 View in CoL ; Gemminger, 1873: 3150 (cat.); Bates, 1881: 163; 1885: 398 (distr.); Blackwelder, 1946: 613 (checklist); Chemsak & Linsley, 1970: 407 (lect.).

Hyperplatys argus View in CoL ; Aurivillius, 1923: 417 (cat.); Blackwelder, 1946: 616 (checklist); Gilmour, 1965: 592 (cat.); Chemsak et al., 1992: 137 (cat.); Monné & Giesbert, 1994: 247 (checklist); Maes et al., 1994: 39 (distr.); Monné, 1995: 68 (cat.); Maes, 1998: 928 (distr.); Monné, 2005: 47 View Cited Treatment (cat.); Swift et al., 2010: 38 (distr.); Maes et al., 2010: 446 (distr.); Audureau & Roguet, 2018: 69 (distr.); Monné, 2020: 58 (cat.).

Bates (1872) described Anisopodus argus View in CoL based on “several examples” from Nicaragua. Aurivillius (1923), without explanation, transferred the species to Hyperplatys Haldeman, 1847 View in CoL . It is difficult to understand the reasons why Aurivillius (1923) made this decision. Examination of the photograph of some specimens of the type series, as well as other specimens, show that the species is better placed in Anisopodus White, 1855 View in CoL . Although the metafemora do not surpass the elytral apex, the size of metatarsomere I (about three times longer than II–III together), as well as the shape of the metafemora (peduncle noticeably long) and general appearance (somewhat elongate and slender) agrees much better with the type species of Anisopodus View in CoL ( A. arachnoides View in CoL ) than with the type species of Hyperplatys View in CoL ( H. maculata Haldeman, 1847 View in CoL ) (metatarsomere I, at most, twice as long as II–III together; metafemoral peduncle short; and general appearance shorter and stouter). Accordingly, the species is transferred to the original genus.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Cerambycidae

Genus

Anisopodus

Loc

Anisopodus argus Bates, 1872

Vlasak, Josef, Santos-Silva, Antonio & Nascimento, Francisco Eriberto De L. 2020
2020
Loc

Hyperplatys argus

Monne, M. A. 2020: 58
Audureau, A. & Roguet, J-P. 2018: 69
Swift, I. P. & Bezark, L. G. & Nearns, E. H. & Solis, A. & Hovore, F. T. 2010: 38
Maes, J. - M. & Berghe, E. & Dauber, D. & Audureau, A. & Nearns, E. & Skilman, F. & Heffern, D. & Monne, M. A. 2010: 446
Monne, M. A. 2005: 47
Maes, J. - M. 1998: 928
Monne, M. A. 1995: 68
Monne, M. A. & Giesbert, E. F. 1994: 247
Maes, J. - M. & Allen, A. & Monne, M. A. & Hovore, F. T. 1994: 39
Chemsak, J. A. & Linsley, E. G. & Noguera, F. A. 1992: 137
Gilmour, E. F. 1965: 592
Blackwelder, R. E. 1946: 616
Aurivillius, C. 1923: 417
1923
Loc

Anisopodus argus

Chemsak, J. A. & Linsley, E. G. 1970: 407
Blackwelder, R. E. 1946: 613
Bates, H. W. 1885: 398
Bates, H. W. 1881: 163
Gemminger M. 1873: 3150
Bates, H. W. 1872: 216
1872
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF