Calliaxina, Nguyen Ngoc-Ho, 2003
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.24199/j.mmv.2021.80.01 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:EA21667A-77A5-411D-9C1A-23ECFFF3D505 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BE8786-D32F-3558-3864-F89FE386DE3F |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Calliaxina |
status |
|
Calliaxina View in CoL Ngoc-Ho, 2003
Calliaxina View in CoL Ngoc-Ho, 2003: 493–494 View Cited Treatment .— Sakai, 2011: 497 (part).—
Poore et al., 2019: 126–127.
Remarks. Calliaxina differs from Eucalliaxiopsis in lacking a transverse ridge on the telson, lacking differentiation between male and female major chelipeds, and always possessing an exopod on maxilliped 3, sometimes vestigial ( Poore et al., 2019; Robles et al., 2020).
Calliaxina View in CoL includes the type species, C. punica (de Saint Laurent and Manning, 1982) View in CoL from the western Mediterranean plus four species from the Indo-West Pacific. Separation of the species is difficult because characters defining each have historically been incompletely documented. Juveniles of all species tend to have larger eyes, more acute rostrums and similar telsons, making differentiation on the basis of these characters impossible. Adult males of four species are known; juvenile males of one of these and of the fifth species have presumably immature pleopods 1 (see Poore et al. [2019] and discussions below under C. bulimba View in CoL and C. novaebritanniae View in CoL ). Liu and Liang’s (2016) key to species included one species here placed in Eucalliaxiopsis View in CoL and relied on the shape of the rostrum and telson, both size-dependent features.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Calliaxina
Poore, Gary 2021 |