Terebellides ramili, Parapar & Martin & Moreira, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4771.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A46FAF72-6F95-4DA3-A41D-FE770D6EDF1F |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3816117 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/97DCCE83-A2BC-48EF-B84A-BB20123827AF |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:97DCCE83-A2BC-48EF-B84A-BB20123827AF |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Terebellides ramili |
status |
sp. nov. |
Terebellides ramili View in CoL sp. nov.
Figures 11D View FIGURE 11 , 28B View FIGURE 28 , 33 View FIGURE 33 , 34 View FIGURE 34 , 37 View FIGURE 37 ; Tables 1, 2 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:97DCCE83-A2BC-48EF-B84A-BB20123827AF
Material examined. Type material. Four specimens: holotype ( MNCN16.01 About MNCN /18615); three paratypes ( MNCN 16.01 About MNCN /18613, 16.01/18614 and 16.01/18616). Non-type material. One specimen (NHMD-231438, Table 1) .
Diagnosis. Body small/medium sized (18.5 mm in length); TC1–5 ventrally whitish. Branchial anterior lobe absent; posterior ventral lobes thinner than dorsal ones, with terminal filament and directly emerging from branchial stem. TC1 notopodia and notochaetae as long as following ones. Thoracic neurochaetae with rostrum/capitium length about 1/1, and capitium with a first row of 5−6 small teeth followed by similar sized ones.
Description based on holotype
Measurements and general body features. Complete specimen, 18.5 mm long and 1.5 mm wide; female with oocytes in body cavity ( Fig. 28B View FIGURE 28 , 33 View FIGURE 33 A−B). Body tapering posteriorly with segments increasingly shorter and crowded towards pygidium. Prostomium compact; short tentacular membrane surrounding mouth, devoid of buccal tentacles. SGI as an expanded structure below tentacular membrane ( Fig. 33A View FIGURE 33 ). Lateral lappets on SGIII–VII (TC1–5), larger in SGIII–IV ( Fig. 33B View FIGURE 33 ).
Branchiae. Branchiae arising as single structure from SGIII, with a single stalked mid-dorsal branch ( Fig. 28B View FIGURE 28 ) having one pair of dorsal (upper), non-fused lobes and one pair of shorter ventral (lower) lobes, neither fused together nor to dorsal ones, with terminal filament ( Fig. 28B View FIGURE 28 , 33 View FIGURE 33 A−B). Anterior projection of dorsal lobes (lobe 5) absent. Both sides of branchial lamellae with cilia; rows and/or tufts or papillae not seen.
Thorax. Eighteen pairs of notopodia (SGIII–XX), with those of TC1 as long as subsequent ones. Neuropodia as sessile pinnules, from TC6 (SGVIII) to pygidium, with uncini in single rows starting from TC7 (SGIX) throughout. First neuropodia (TC6) with 4–5 sharply bent, acute-tipped, geniculate chaetae ( Fig. 34A View FIGURE 34 ) showing minute teeth forming a capitium. From TC7, neuropodia with up to 6–10 uncini per torus in one row, with long shafted denticulate hooks, rostrum about same length as capitium, with 8–10 small teeth above main fang, surmounted by two rows of several teeth of same size ( Fig. 34 View FIGURE 34 B–D).
Abdomen. Thirty-one neuropodia as erect pinnules, with about 25−30 uncini per torus having four teeth above main fang surmounted by an upper crest of 4–5 teeth and a variable number of smaller teeth ( Fig. 34 View FIGURE 34 E–F).
Other body features. Pairs of nephridial papillae both at TC1; dorsal paired nephridial openings in anterior thoracic notopodia not seen. Pygidium blunt, as funnel-like depression. Five anterior thoracic chaetigers (TC1−5) ventro-laterally whitish ( Fig. 33A View FIGURE 33 ); last two (TC4–5) more pigmented.
Methyl green staining pattern. Anterior CH 1 to CH 3 solid; CH 4 to CH 12 striped; being CH 4 and CH 5 much more marked than previous ones, and CH 12 faded; J-shaped glandular region slightly marked lateral to CH 2 and CH 3; near pattern 5 of Schüller & Hutchings (2010) ( Fig. 37 View FIGURE 37 ).
Variability. Body 6.0 mm long in the only complete (and probably immature) paratype (MNCN16.01/18613). Specimen NHMD-231438 ( Fig. 33C View FIGURE 33 ), collected during the Galathea expedition and originally identified as T. stroemii by Kirkegaard (1959), has been identified here as T. af. ramili . It is a 22-mm long female with oocytes that was collected nearby the type location and at similar depths (Table 1). However, its identity cannot be fully confirmed as colouration of TC4–TC5 is different than others being more widely distributed in TC4 and much less in TC5 ( Fig. 33C View FIGURE 33 ). Moreover, this specimen bears shorter branchial ventral lobes than in T. ramili sp. nov. and lacks terminal filament.
Type locality. Off Congo; 190 m depth (Table 1) .
Distribution and bathymetry. Off Congo and Namibia; 190−537 m depth ( Fig. 11D View FIGURE 11 ; Table 1).
Etymology. The species is named after Dr. Francisco Ramil (Universidade de Vigo, Spain), for his numerous contributions to the taxonomy of marine invertebrates, especially Cnidarians, in many world seas but specifically in the Iberian Peninsula, Antarctica and the Atlantic African littoral.
Remarks. The conspicuous white colouration of T. ramili sp. nov. resembles that of the boreal Terebellides gracilis Malm, 1874 , recently reported from Iceland by Parapar et al. (2011) and the Adriatic Sea by Parapar et al. (2013). The type material redescribed by Parapar et al. (2011) shows a homogeneous colour pattern between TC1 and TC4, while in T. ramili sp. nov. it appears from TC1 to TC5 being even more conspicuous in TC4 and TC5. Furthermore, TC1 notopodia and notochaetae in the Mediterranean specimens of T. gracilis are smaller than in other chaetigers (similar throughout or slightly larger in T. ramili sp. nov.) and the thoracic uncini show large anterior teeth in the capitium ( Parapar et al., 2011: Fig. 10C View FIGURE 10 ). These teeth are closer to Type 1, as it happens in T. longiseta sp. nov. and T. kirkegaardi sp. nov., or Type 2, as in T. fauveli sp. nov., and different to the Type 4 present in T. ramili sp. nov. Moreover, T. ramili sp. nov. also differs from the three aforementioned species in the branchial shape, size of TC1 and ventral colour pattern (see above).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |