Eotrogaspidia rubripes ( André, 1901 ) Okayasu & Lelej & Williams, 2021

Okayasu, Juriya, Lelej, Arkady S. & Williams, Kevin A., 2021, Review of Eotrogaspidia Lelej (Hymenoptera: Mutillidae: Trogaspidiini), Zootaxa 4920 (1), pp. 56-90 : 79

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4920.1.2

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:23D36297-E800-4D57-80AF-F80B8399E621

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4498141

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BF4A48-6579-FF83-FF1E-FA13FAE7FF39

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Eotrogaspidia rubripes ( André, 1901 )
status

comb. nov.

Eotrogaspidia rubripes ( André, 1901) , comb. nov.

( Figs 4B, 4F View FIGURE 4 , 12F View FIGURE 12 )

Mutilla catanensis var. rubripes André, 1901: 287 , ♀, syntypes ♀ ( Syrie [= Syria]; Jéricho, [ Palestine]) [MNHN]; André 1902: 33.

Trogaspidia rubripes: Invrea 1950: 21 , ♀; Invrea 1965: 80, ♀; Lelej 2002: 85; Pagliano et al. 2020: 289.

Diagnosis. FEMALE. Posterolateral propodeal margin at most tuberculate ( Fig. 4B View FIGURE 4 ). T2 pale setal spots small, distance between them 1.0 × or more than spot diameter ( Fig. 4B View FIGURE 4 ); T3–4 with a pair of small lateral pale setal spots, distance between spots and that between spot and lateral margin of tergum 0.5 × spot diameter ( Fig. 4B View FIGURE 4 ); pygidial plate irregularly rugose on anterior 1/2 and smooth posteriorly ( Fig. 12F View FIGURE 12 ). MALE. Unknown.

Material examined. 2♀. Afghanistan: LAGHMAN PROVINCE : 1♀, Shamakat , 2.IV.1972, O. Kabakov leg. [ IBSS] . Iran: MAZANDERAN: 1♀, coastal plain between Chalus and Shahsavar, 20 m, 12.V.1965, D.B. Baker [ SEMC] .

Distribution. Afghanistan *: Laghman. Iran *: Mazanderan. Palestine ( André 1901; Invrea 1950, 1965). Syria ( André 1901).

Remarks. The female of Eotrogaspidia rubripes resembles that of Neotrogaspidia hammeri ( Suárez, 1959) described from Cyprus ( Suárez 1959) and currently known from Cyprus, Greece, Palestine, Iran, Armenia, Azerbaijan, South-West Turkmenistan ( Lelej 2002). Suárez (1959) and Invrea (1965) considered that the male of N. hammeri was the opposite sex of E. rubripes . The true female of N. hammeri was associated with a male by Lelej (1985). The female of E. rubripes differs from that of N. hammeri by the shape and sculpture of the pygidial plate.

SEMC

University of Kansas - Biodiversity Institute

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

Family

Mutillidae

Genus

Eotrogaspidia

Loc

Eotrogaspidia rubripes ( André, 1901 )

Okayasu, Juriya, Lelej, Arkady S. & Williams, Kevin A. 2021
2021
Loc

Trogaspidia rubripes:

Pagliano, G. & Brothers, D. J. & Cambra, R. & Lelej, A. S. & Lo Cascio, P. & Matteini Palmerini, M. & Scaramozzino, P. L. & Williams, K. A. & Romano, M. 2020: 289
Lelej, A. S. 2002: 85
Invrea, F. 1965: 80
Invrea, F. 1950: 21
1950
Loc

Mutilla catanensis var. rubripes André, 1901: 287

Andre, E. 1902: 33
Andre, E. 1901: 287
1901
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF