Typhlocarcinops ocularius Rathbun, 1914
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4788.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7A461DBA-00B7-48DB-9320-4775DA8F21B2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10564039 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C05222-FF94-FC34-FF35-D6A5FD48FDA9 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Typhlocarcinops ocularius Rathbun, 1914 |
status |
|
Typhlocarcinops ocularius Rathbun, 1914 View in CoL
( Figs. 45 View FIGURE 45 , 46 View FIGURE 46 )
Typhlocarcinops ocularia Rathbun, 1914: 153 View in CoL ; Tesch 1918: 212; Yokoya 1933: 201; Sakai 1939: 572; 1976: 547, text figs. 294a, b; Dai et al. 1986: 385, text fig. 203(1–3), pl. 56(2); Dai & Yang 1991: 414, text fig. 203(1–3), pl. 56(2).
Typhlocarcinops ocularius View in CoL — Ng et al. 2008: 144.
Material examined. Holotype: male (17.0 × 13.5 mm) ( USNM 46408 About USNM ), station 5392, Destacado Island , between Samar and Masbate, Philippines, 243 m, coll. RV Albatross, 13 March 1909.
Diagnosis. Carapace ( Fig. 45A, B View FIGURE 45 ) about 1.3 times broader than long, surface with granules anteriorly, posteriorly, regions not indicated; anterolateral margin arcuate, lined with tiny granules, entire. Front ( Fig. 45B, C View FIGURE 45 ) bilobed, with shallow median cleft, margin of each lobe slightly convex. Orbit ( Fig. 45B, C View FIGURE 45 ) short, bulbous ocular peduncles filling orbit, immovable, cornea small, pigmented. Epistome ( Fig. 45C View FIGURE 45 ) relatively broad, concave. Antennal peduncles relatively long. Third maxilliped ( Fig. 45D View FIGURE 45 ) with merus broad, squarish, outer and inner margins straight, ischium as broad as and, longer than merus, inner margin slightly shorter than outer margin, lower margin slightly oblique; exopod relatively stout, tip reaching to just before distal edge of merus, inner margin with distinct tooth. Chelipeds unequal ( Fig. 45A, G, H View FIGURE 45 ), major chela smooth, shiny, minor chela with some tubercles and setae on lower margin; outer surface of fingers with longitudinal ridge on dactylus and fixed finger, continue to palm; cutting edges of fingers with prominent teeth; inner angle of carpus with short spine ( Fig. 45A View FIGURE 45 ). P2−P5 ( Fig. 45A View FIGURE 45 ) proportionally long, fringe by sparse long setae on dorsal and ventral margins; merus of P5 not reaching front when folded. Fused thoracic sternites 1, 2 broadly triangular ( Fig. 45E, F View FIGURE 45 ), proportionally broad; thoracic sternites 3, 4 partially fused, with only lateral suture discernible. Male pleon ( Fig. 45E, F View FIGURE 45 ) relatively narrow, telson long, 1.8 times as long as somite 6, subtriangular with rounded distal margin. G1 ( Fig. 46 View FIGURE 46 ) slender, upper half longer than lower half, slightly curved, distal part directed upwards with pointed tip. Female not known.
Remarks. This species was described from one male collected from the central Philippines. Yokoya (1933: 201) reported “ Typhrocarcinops ocularia Rathbun, 1914 ” on the basis of five males and four females from the prefectures of Yamaguchi and Shimane in Japan but did not elaborate, even though at that time, no one had figured that species. Yokoya (1933) also did not provide any figures or description. Sakai (1939, 1976) accepted Yokoya’s (1933) record of the species from Japan without comment. Takeda & Miyake (1968: 571) identified four males and a female from the East China Sea as T. ocularius , described the species and figured the G1; but Sakai (1976: 547) commented that their specimens probably belonged to T. decrescens . This present study considers that the record of Takeda & Miyake’s (1968) should be referred to T. denticarpes . Sakai (1976: 547, text-fig. 294a, b) did not examine specimens of this species from Japan but figured the type of T. ocularia from the Philippines. The G1 figures provided by Takeda & Miyake (1968: fig. 9c, d) are different from what is now known for T. ocularius s. str. and confirms Sakai’s (1976) supposition. The distal part of the G1 of Takeda & Miyake’s (1968) species, however, is bent at right angles whereas that of T. decrescens is more curved and hook-shaped ( Figs. 23 View FIGURE 23 B–E, H–K, 24A–G). Takeda & Miyake’s (1968) figures compare well with T. denticarpes ( Figs. 28 View FIGURE 28 , 29 View FIGURE 29 C–F, H–J, 30C–F).
Dai et al. (1986) figured the type male from the Philippines and added T. ocularius to their fauna list even though, as they admitted only in the Chinese text, no specimens had been recorded from China. Dai & Yang (1991) also listed the species as part of China’s fauna but without any comment. Typhrocarcinops ocularius must be excluded from the Chinese fauna until specimens are actually found.
Type locality. Destacado Island , Philippines .
Distribution. Philippines and possibly Japan.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Typhlocarcinops ocularius Rathbun, 1914
Ng, Peter K. L. & Rahayu, Dwi Listyo 2020 |
Typhlocarcinops ocularius
Ng, P. K. L. & Guinot, D. & Davie, P. J. F. 2008: 144 |
Typhlocarcinops ocularia
Dai, A. - Y. & Yang, S. - L. 1991: 414 |
Dai, A. - Y. & Yang, S. - L. & Song, Y. - Z. & Chen, G. - X. 1986: 385 |
Sakai, T. 1976: 547 |
Sakai, T. 1939: 572 |
Yokoya, Y. 1933: 201 |
Tesch, J. J. 1918: 212 |
Rathbun, M. J. 1914: 153 |