Siboglinidae Caullery, 1914

Georgieva, Magdalena N., Little, Crispin T. S., Watson, Jonathan S., Sephton, Mark A., Ball, Alexander D. & Glover, Adrian G., 2019, Identification of fossil worm tubes from Phanerozoic hydrothermal vents and cold seeps, Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 17 (4), pp. 287-329 : 297

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.1080/14772019.2017.1412362

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10912364

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C0814B-9037-FFB0-3F43-FC374DA4FD4D

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Siboglinidae Caullery, 1914
status

 

?Family Siboglinidae Caullery, 1914 View in CoL (?vestimentiferan)

‘Canyon River tubes’

( Fig. 6 View Figure 6 )

2000 vestimentiferan worm tubes Goedert, Peckmann, & Reitner: 995, fig. 3.

Material. WA-CR LACMIP 16957, several large, straight tubes preserved in the same orientation. JLG 473, tubes embedded in carbonate matrix, thin sections of tubes only. Donated by J. L. Goedert.

Occurrence. Canyon River, south-west Washington State, USA (47 º 18.18 ' N, 123 º 30.52 ' W). Seep carbonate within siltstone, Lincoln Creek Formation, lower Oligocene ( Goedert et al. 2000; Peckmann et al. 2002).

Description. Carbonate tubes from this locality were originally described by Goedert et al. (2000). They measure 1.1–7.0 mm in diameter, and are non-branching, non-agglutinated and not attached to other tubes ( Fig. 6A–C View Figure 6 ). Tubes taper slightly, and the walls of the majority of the tubes are smooth and lack ornamentation ( Fig. 6A, B View Figure 6 ), while longitudinal wrinkles are present in one small-diameter tube ( Fig. 6C View Figure 6 ). Tube walls are thick and multi-layered, and at times delaminated ( Fig. 6D View Figure 6 ), suggesting an originally organic composition. The tubes appear to have originally been rigid as walls are generally not compressed, both in hand specimen ( Fig. 6A–C View Figure 6 ) and thin section ( Fig. 6E View Figure 6 ), and fluorescence during CLSM analysis of the tube walls further suggests that the tubes were originally organic ( Fig. 6F View Figure 6 ).

Remarks. These tubes were suggested to have been made by vestimentiferans by Goedert et al. (2000), resembling tubes made by the genus Escarpia . Despite the tubes being largely unresolved in the cladistic and cluster analyses ( Figs 22 View Figure 22 , 24 View Figure 24 ), they closely resemble those of vestimentiferans owing to their smooth walls and columnar morphology. The diameter range of the tubes, as well as the hard, organic, mostly thick and multi-layered nature of the tube walls, are typical of most vestimentiferans. We therefore suggest that vestimentiferans are the most likely builders of these tubes, but this assignment is tentative due to the poor resolution of these tubes in the cladistic analysis.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Annelida

Class

Polychaeta

Order

Sabellida

Family

Siboglinidae

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF