Sphingius nilgiriensis Gravely, 1931

Sankaran, Pradeep M., Caleb, John T. D. & Sebastian, Pothalil A., 2020, A review of the genus Sphingius Thorell, 1890 from India (Araneae: Liocranidae), Zootaxa 4896 (4), pp. 505-522 : 512-514

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4896.4.3

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0824AFA4-4E8B-419B-972C-0FA0A88538FF

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4387709

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C08789-C535-4F64-FF62-D01B8913FEF5

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Sphingius nilgiriensis Gravely, 1931
status

 

Sphingius nilgiriensis Gravely, 1931 View in CoL

Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6

Sphingius nilgiriensis Gravely, 1931: 271 View in CoL , fig. 19C; Majumder & Tikader, 1991: 155, figs 330–333.

Type material. Syntype Ƌ from INDIA: Tamil Nadu: Nilgiris: Kundah (not Kundahs): (11°15’46.41’’N, 76°37’59.98’’E), 1856 m a.s.l., leg. Barnes, 24 September–3 October 1925, deposited in NZC-ZSI (no register number), examined ( Fig. 6G View FIGURE 6 ) GoogleMaps .

Diagnosis. Males of S. nilgiriensis seem closely related to the males of S. superbus Dankittipakul, Tavano & Singtripop, 2011 , but can easily be separated from the latter by group of bristles located on the proximal part of ventral scutum which are restricted to the rear end of the posterior margin of ventral scutum in S. superbus (compare Fig. 6D View FIGURE 6 with Dankittipakul et al. 2011: fig. 5).

Supplementary description. Male ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 A–D). Dorsal scutum covering almost entire length of opisthosoma; ventral scutum smaller than dorsal scutum, less sclerotized; posterior half of venter medially bears group of bristles ( Fig. 6D View FIGURE 6 ). Body length 5.26. Carapace length 2.33, width 1.85. Opisthosoma length 2.93, width 1.34. Eye diameters: ALE 0.11, AME 0.06, PLE 0.09, PME 0.08. Eye interdistances: ALE–PLE 0.09, AME–ALE 0.03, AME–AME 0.05, AME–PME 0.10, PME–PLE 0.08, PME–PME 0.05. Chelicerae length 0.79. Clypeus height at ALEs 0.07, at AMEs 0.08. Measurements of pedipalp and legs. Pedipalp 1.88 [0.73, 0.32, 0.29, 0.54], I 5.74 [1.59, 0.85, 1.30, 1.10, 0.90], II 4.88 [1.50, 0.78, 1.07, 0.97, 0.56], III 4.56 [1.23, 0.69, 0.84, 1.06, 0.74], IV 7.32 [2.03, 0.96, 1.58, 1.83, 0.92]. Leg formula: 4123. Pedipalp ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 E–F, H): retrolateral tibial apophysis short, broad at base, gradually narrowing towards apex ( Fig. 6F View FIGURE 6 : RTA). Accessory tegular apophysis short, flat, angular in retrolateral view ( Fig. 6E View FIGURE 6 : TA). Embolus moderately long, thin, with blunt tip ( Fig. 6E View FIGURE 6 : E). Median tegular apophysis large, with retrolateral process with truncated apex ( Fig. 6E View FIGURE 6 : MA). Conductor apparently absent.

Female. Unknown.

Note. In his original description, Gravely (1931) mentioned that the most conspicuous feature of S. nilgiriensis was a white membraneous structure in its pedipalp. It is, in fact, the haematodocha of the expanded pedipalp ( Fig. 6E View FIGURE 6 : H).

Remarks. The ZSI collection has one glass bottle for this species labelled as “ Type ” (1514/18), containing a male specimen in fairly good condition, with broken legs and with intact pedipalps.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Liocranidae

Genus

Sphingius

Loc

Sphingius nilgiriensis Gravely, 1931

Sankaran, Pradeep M., Caleb, John T. D. & Sebastian, Pothalil A. 2020
2020
Loc

Sphingius nilgiriensis

Majumder, S. C. & Tikader, B. K. 1991: 155
Gravely, F. H. 1931: 271
1931
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF