Anaphalis marcescens (Wight) C.B.Clarke
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5252/adansonia2021v43a17 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C09B77-FFCA-3479-FF56-2FCDFABFFE65 |
|
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
|
scientific name |
Anaphalis marcescens (Wight) C.B.Clarke |
| status |
|
Anaphalis marcescens (Wight) C.B.Clarke
In the Compositae Indicae : 110 ( Clarke 1876). — Basionym: Gnaphalium marcescens Wight, Icones Plantarum Indiae Orientalis 3: 10 ( Wight 1846) ( Fig. 2B View FIG ).
TYPE CITATION. — “Neilgherries.”
LECTOTYPE ( HERE DESIGNATED). — India. Tamil Nadu, Neeilgherries ( Nilgiri District), s.d., Wight s.n. ( lecto-, MH [ MH00007084 ]!).
RESIDUAL SYNTYPE. — India. Tamil Nadu, Neilgherries ( Nilgiri District), s.d., Wight s.n. ( syn-, K [ K000899039 image]!).
DISTRIBUTION. — India ( Kerala and Tamil Nadu); Sri Lanka and China
REMARKS
Gnaphalium marcescens was originally described by Wight (1846) from Neeilgherries. Later Clarke (1876) in his book ‘ Compositae Indicae’ transferred G. marcescens to the genus Anaphalis DC. and named it as A. marcescens (Wight) C.B.Clarke. We have traced two specimens from two herbaria, one at MH (MH00007084) and one at K (K000899039). Of these, the sheet with barcode MH00007084 matches well with the illustration of the protologue by Wight. Hence it is designated here as the lectotype for the name G. marcescens .
| MH |
Naturhistorisches Museum, Basel |
| K |
Royal Botanic Gardens |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Anaphalis marcescens (Wight) C.B.Clarke
| Murugan, Perumal, Murugan, Chidambaram & Karthigeyan, Kaliyamurthy 2021 |
Compositae
| Clarke 1876: 110 |
| Wight 1846: 10 |
