Coletinia intermedia Molero, Bach & Gaju, 2013
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3615.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D53E1122-AA33-4152-90BE-3D717979C648 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C0A74C-FFD1-FFFC-FF4F-6BF6E1E6948C |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Coletinia intermedia Molero, Bach & Gaju |
status |
sp. nov. |
Coletinia intermedia Molero, Bach & Gaju new species
Figs. 9C View FIGURES 9, 10 , 54–64 View FIGURES 54–61 View FIGURES 62–64
Studied material. Alicante , Alfas del Pi, Cova del Far, UTM 30SYH5672, 8-IV-2006, male holotype mounted on a slide, deposited in MVHN, Cod.: 080406SG2. Four paratypes: 1 male in 70% alcohol (partially dissected for SEM study, deposited in UCO, Ref. Z 2188) and 3 females (1 on a slide, deposited in UCO, Ref. Z 2188 and 2 in alcohol, deposited in MVHN, Cod.: 080406SG2) same collection data as holotype .
Additional specimens: Murcia, Calasparra, Cueva del Puerto, Sala de los Corales , 5 July to August 2003, 1 male collected in a beer trap ( MVHN, Cod.: 201206 RV57 ) and 3 females and 2 juveniles, not well preserved, collected in a similar trap ( MVHN, Cod.: 201206 RV59 ) .
Description. Body length of holotype 10 mm, up to 11 mm in the remaining specimens. Subcylindrical shape, with very narrow thorax, maximum width 1.5 mm. Body light yellowish to nearly transparent, gut contents often visible. Antennae as long as the body or slightly longer, broken in the holotype (maximum length preserved: 11.5 mm). Macrosetae with a low degree of spiralization. Head with typical setation, with few short and thin setae and very few bifid macrosetae.
Antennae symmetrical, in male with a pedicellar apophysis that resembles that of C. tinauti or C. calaforrai n. sp., reaching fourth joint of flagellum. Apical cone joined internally on side of flagellum to the lamellar expansion, which is shorter than the cone. At the apical part of the external side of the trunk, two bifid macrosetae inserted near the cavity formed by the apical cone and the expansion; tegument of this cavity smooth, tegument of trunk rugose and scale-like ( Figs. 54, 55 View FIGURES 54–61 ). Three additional long bifid macrosetae inserted in the pedicellus of the antenna.
Distal article of maxillary palp relatively short and wide, approximately 3.8–4.5 times longer than wide and about 1.3 times longer than penultimate article. Labial palp with typical configuration of the genus, with 6 basiconic sensilla along the outer side and 4–5 along the inner side.
L/W ratios of tibiae given in Table 2. Pro—and mesotibiae with 2 dorsal, 1 lateral and 4–5 ventral macrosetae, metatibiae usually with one dorsal and five ventral macrosetae. Tibial spurs slightly denticulate.
Urotergites I-IX without special features. Tenth urotergite of male with posterior border nearly straight or slightly concave ( Fig. 56 View FIGURES 54–61 ); posterolateral lobes with 4+4 sensory pegs appearing bilobulate apically when visualized by OM (corresponding to example photographed in Fig. 9C View FIGURES 9, 10 ). In addition to 4+4 conules, one male from Murcia with 1+1 additional anterior pegs and 2 spiniform pegs on one side ( Fig. 57 View FIGURES 54–61 ). Long setae spread over extension of the disc of the urotergite in both sexes, particularly in the centre and hind margin of the disc, scarcer in the lateral region. In females, posterior border slightly concave and flanked by 1+1 long spines ( Fig. 58 View FIGURES 54–61 ); tenth urotergite of a female from Murcia with less setose disc .
Urosternites I-VIII with 1+1 submedian, 1+1 sublateral and 1+1 discal bifid macrosetae.
Eighth urosternite of male convex but slightly truncated at posterior border ( Fig. 59 View FIGURES 54–61 ).
Length and basal width of female subgenital plate equal (ratio = 0.9–1), with straight posterior border that is widely truncated in the female paratype ( Fig. 60 View FIGURES 54–61 ), less widely so in female from Murcia ( Fig. 61 View FIGURES 54–61 ). Parameres 5.2–5.3 times longer than wide, as long as ninth stylets. Ovipositor long, surpassing level of ninth stylets by nearly 2 times their length ( Fig. 62 View FIGURES 62–64 ), with 18–19 divisions .
Paracercus without sensory pegs in both sexes, at most with two acute spines not clearly equivalent to pegs. Second division of cerci bearing 4+4 sensory pegs with blunt apex ( Fig. 63 View FIGURES 62–64 ); in a male from Murcia these pegs more acute and 1+1 pegs on the first cercal segment ( Fig. 64 View FIGURES 62–64 ).
Etymology. This new species is called intermedia because of the presence of intermediate characteristics within the “ capolongoi ” group (such as the L/W ratio of tibiae, shape of eighth urosternite of the male, number of divisions of the ovipositor) and because of the central geographical position within the distribution of the species belonging to this group ( Fig. 173 View FIGURE 173 ).
Remarks. Coletinia intermedia n. sp. is a member of the “ capolongoi ” group and differentiation of this species can be found in the Discussion section below.
Some variability has been observed between the specimens of the type locality in Alfas del Pi (Alicante) and those from the cave of Calasparra (Murcia) assigned to the same new species. In spite of the differences observed (different number of sensory pegs on urotergite X of the male, a different number of setae in the disc of this urotergite in females, different shape in the posterior border of the subgenital plate and one additional sensory peg in the first segment of the cerci in males from Murcia), the insects from both caves are very similar and because of the scarce number of specimens available, this variability cannot be evaluated. Thus, we cannot pronounce in favour of considering them as different taxa. Perhaps when a greater number of specimens are available, molecular studies will solve this problem, together with the confirmation of the stability of the aforementioned morphological differences.
OM |
Otago Museum |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.