Cephaloleia impressa Uhmann, 1930
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.37520/aemnp.2020.048 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FD33083B-91A0-4C89-B45D-A31561955027 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10536234 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C0F621-9D19-9E05-FC26-BF305324FE78 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Cephaloleia impressa Uhmann, 1930 |
status |
|
* Cephaloleia impressa Uhmann, 1930 View in CoL
( Fig. 11 View Figs 8–12 )
Published record. São Paulo (UΗආൺඇඇ 1930).
Type material examined. Hඈඅඈඍඒඉൾ ( Fig. 11 View Figs 8–12 ): glued, missing right antenna from antennomere VI on, ‘ SAÕ PAULO | BRAS.MRÁZ LGT. | MUS.PRAGENSE [w, p, cb, bf] || HOLOTYPE [r, t, s] || Cephaloleia | impressa n. sp. | det. Uhmann 28. [w, hw by Uhmann, s] || Collect. | Spaeth [w, p, cb]’ ( NHMW).
Additional material examined. BRAZIL: Sඞඈ Pൺඎඅඈ: without further data, 9 spec., J. Mráz leg. ( NMPC, 3 LSPC).
Distribution. Brazil (Santa Catarina, São Paulo).
Remarks. Spaeth also identified part of the hispines and retained duplicates for his collection. Among them were also specimens which he was not able to identify to species, so he sent them later to Uhmann but probably without mentioning that more specimens exist in NMPC collection. As a result, C. impressa was described based on the holotype assigned to Spaeth’s collection, even though there were more specimens in NMPC.
Sඍൺංඇൾඌ +| Gൺඋർටൺ-Rඈൻඅൾൽඈ (2014) published two specimens from Nova Teutonia (Santa Cataria) as C. caerulescens ; however, based on the photograph provided by Ed Riley they were misidentified and belong to C. impressa .
NHMW |
Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien |
NMPC |
National Museum Prague |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.