Mesabolivar eberhardi Huber, 2000
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3847.3.5 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:EAAB85B8-FDD6-4B7A-963C-E998D7D2324A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5328351 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C0FE36-8064-2805-FF51-FDD0FB5B0707 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Mesabolivar eberhardi Huber, 2000 |
status |
|
Mesabolivar eberhardi Huber, 2000 View in CoL
Mesabolivar eberhardi Huber, 2000: 198 View in CoL View Cited Treatment , figs. 184, 194, 769–781 (♂♀).
Blechroscelis acuoso González-Sponga, 2011a: 24 , pl. 1, figs. 1–9; new synonymy.
Blechroscelis araguanus González-Sponga, 2011a: 24 –25, pl. 2, figs. 1–9; new synonymy. Blechroscelis blechroscelis González-Sponga, 2011a: 25 View in CoL –26, pl. 3, figs. 1–9; new synonymy. Blechroscelis copeyensis González-Sponga, 2011a: 26 , pl. 4, figs. 1–9; new synonymy. Blechroscelis cordillerano González-Sponga, 2011a: 26 –27, pl. 5, figs. 1–9; new synonymy. Blechroscelis andinensis González-Sponga, 2011a: 27 –28, pl. 6, figs. 1–9; new synonymy.
Justification of synonymies. Mesabolivar eberhardi View in CoL is a variable species but differences among populations are inconsistent and genetic p-distances are low as typical for intraspecific variation ( Huber 2000; Astrin et al. 2006). While most of González-Sponga’s drawings of his six “ Blechroscelis ” species clearly point towards Mesabolivar eberhardi View in CoL , some remarkable deviations do occur. However, re-examination of González-Sponga’s material (by PAC) revealed that all those apparent differences resulted from varying angles of view and from inaccurate drawing. For example, the male palpal trochanter apophyses of “ B. copeyensis ” and “ B. andinensis ” are not slender as in González-Sponga’s drawings but short and thick as usual for the species (cf. fig. 773 in Huber 2000). The retrolateral process on the palpal femur of “ B. cordillerano ” is simple as usual (cf. fig. 773 in Huber 2000). The tips of the procursi vary widely in González-Sponga’s drawings but in all specimens they actually conform to the bifid structure distinctive for the species (cf. figs. 775–776 in Huber 2000). The same is true for the bulbal process (embolus) which is also distinctively bifid (cf. fig. 778 in Huber 2000). The chelicerae of M. eberhardi View in CoL carry a highly distinctive pair of proximal lateral projections (cf. fig. 774 in Huber 2000); these are shown in all of González-Sponga’s drawings but in those drawings they appear more variable than they actually are. Finally, the epigynum of M. eberhardi View in CoL has a long median groove (cf. fig. 780 in Huber 2000), also in specimens of “ B. acuoso ” and “ B. cordillerano ” (contrary to González-Sponga’s drawings where the grooves appear short).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Mesabolivar eberhardi Huber, 2000
Huber, Bernhard A., Colmenares, Pío A. & Ramirez, Martin J. 2014 |
Blechroscelis acuoso González-Sponga, 2011a : 24
Gonzalez-Sponga 2011: 24 |
Blechroscelis araguanus González-Sponga, 2011a : 24
Gonzalez-Sponga 2011: 24 |
Gonzalez-Sponga 2011: 25 |
Gonzalez-Sponga 2011: 26 |
Gonzalez-Sponga 2011: 26 |
Gonzalez-Sponga 2011: 27 |