Biatriospora borsei

Calabon, Mark S., Jones, E. B. Gareth, Pang, Ka-Lai, Abdel-Wahab, Mohamed A., Jin, Jing, Devadatha, Bandarupalli, Sadaba, Resurreccion B., Apurillo, Carlo Chris & Hyde, Kevin D., 2023, Updates on the classification and numbers of marine fungi, Botanica Marina (Warsaw, Poland) 66 (4), pp. 213-238 : 223

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.1515/bot-2023-0032

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11105780

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C1853B-AD60-FF66-FF19-D33EFC7E84A4

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Biatriospora borsei
status

 

2.5.2 Biatriospora borsei View in CoL

Biatriospora View in CoL , typified by B. marina View in CoL , was described as a sexual genus from mangrove roots in Seychelles with fusiform, 1 – 4 septate, brown to dark brown ascospores with hyaline polar chambers which release mucilage ( Hyde and Borse 1986). Sequences of B. marina View in CoL from a collection made in Singapore placed this species basal to Lophiostomataceae View in CoL , Sporormiaceae View in CoL and a group of unclassified taxa in a phylogenetic analysis of 18 S, 28 S rDNA, RPB 2 and TEF- 1α ( Suetrong et al. 2009).

The genus Nigrograna View in CoL was established to accommodate N. mackinnonii View in CoL , a species originally described in Pyrenochaeta ( de Gruyter et al. 2013) . Hyde et al. (2013) established a new family Biatriosporaceae View in CoL to accommodate Biatriospora View in CoL . In a phylogenetic analysis using the same genes, Ahmed et al. (2014) found that N. mackinnonii View in CoL grouped with B. marina View in CoL , and thus referred the former species to Biatriospora View in CoL . Later, four more species of Biatriospora View in CoL were described from woody plants as endophytes: B. antibiotica View in CoL , B. carollii View in CoL , B. yasuniana View in CoL and B. peruviensis ( KolařÍk et al. 2017) View in CoL , unaware that a new family Nigrogranaceae View in CoL was established to accommodate Nigrograna View in CoL with N. mackinnonii View in CoL as the type, and the new combination of Melanomma fuscidulum in Nigrograna View in CoL and the description of the new species N. mycophila View in CoL , N. norvegica View in CoL and N. obliqua ( Jaklitsch and Voglmayr 2016) View in CoL . Jaklitsch and Voglmayr (2016) voiced doubts on the identification of the Biatriospora marina View in CoL isolate and the validity of the Biatriosporaceae View in CoL . Consequently, KolařÍk (2018) accepted the genus Nigrograna View in CoL and the family Nigrogranaceae View in CoL , and transferred B. antibiotica View in CoL , B. carollii View in CoL , B. yasuniana View in CoL and B. peruviensis View in CoL to Nigrograna View in CoL . After these revisions, Biatriospora View in CoL became a monotypic genus but B. borsei View in CoL was described as a new species in Hongsanan et al. (2020a). Biatriospora borsei View in CoL clustered with B. marina View in CoL (with a good support) within a group of Nigrograna spp. based on 18 S, 28 S, ITS rDNA, RPB 2 and TEF- 1α, although B. borsei View in CoL is a hyphomycete with no known sexual stage. As discussed here, fresh isolates of B. marina View in CoL should be collected to clarify the taxonomic position of this species, B. borsei View in CoL , the genus Nigrograna View in CoL and the families Biatriosporaceae View in CoL and Nigrogranaceae View in CoL .

S

Department of Botany, Swedish Museum of Natural History

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF