Coptocheilus Gould, 1862
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222933.2020.1863497 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:EC10258C-E544-4F0E-9D08-569F87B93448 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C187FD-910C-4D51-FE5B-FB91FE8DD0BA |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Coptocheilus Gould, 1862 |
status |
|
Coptocheilus Gould, 1862 View in CoL 裂唇螺属
Coptocheilus Gould, 1862: 282 View in CoL .; Schistoloma Kobelt, 1902: 298 View in CoL (replacement name of Coptocheilus Gould, 1862 View in CoL ).; Pinteria Varga, 1972: 134 View in CoL (type species: Pinteria croesus Varga, 1972 View in CoL , by original designation)
Type species. Cyclostoma altum Sowerby I, 1842 , by original designation
Remarks. Kobelt (1902) established Schistoloma as a replacement name of Coptocheilus Gould, 1862 , by treating Coptocheilus as a junior homonym of Coptochilus Amyot & Serville, 1843 [ Hemiptera ]. However, according to the ICZN guideline ‘One-letter difference’ ( ICZN 1999, Art. 56.2), Coptocheilus Gould, 1862 , is not a junior homonym of Coptochilus Amyot & Serville, 1843 , and Kobelt’s replacement name was unnecessary. Also, Coptocheilus was used as valid after 1899 ( Fulton 1903), Art. 23.9 ( ICZN 1999) and cannot be used to conserve the name Schistoloma over Coptocheilus . Bui and Páll-Gergely (2020) already restored the name Coptocheilus while this manuscript was in preparation. The Chinese name remains unchanged to maintain taxonomic stability.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Coptocheilus Gould, 1862
Chen, Zhe-Yu 2021 |
Coptocheilus
Varga A 1972: 134 |
Kobelt W 1902: 298 |
Gould AA 1862: 282 |