Meganodontia Bouchet and Cosel, 2004
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.4202/app.00461.2018 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CD76DB43-2C07-428A-AE13-17512904A6B9 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C18C7C-FFA1-0702-54AA-FCFDFA1C4DF8 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Meganodontia Bouchet and Cosel, 2004 |
status |
|
Genus Meganodontia Bouchet and Cosel, 2004 View in CoL
Type species: Meganodontia acetabulum Bouchet and Cosel, 2004 ; Recent , Tashi fishing ground, off Tashi, NE coast of Taiwan .
Remarks.— Meganodontia acetabulum Bouchet and Cosel, 2004 has a very large shell (up to 150 mm in length). Bouchet and Cosel (2004) listed the generic characters: edentulous hinge, thick-shelled, large anterior adductor muscle scar broadening ventrally, less prominent umbo and maximum height located behind the umbo. However, based on our observations of published photographs of the Italian fossil species Meganodontia hoernea ( Des Moulins, 1868) , this latter character seems to be absent, so it may be a species rather than generic-level character.
Within the subfamily Pegophyseminae , Pegophysema Stewart, 1930 differs from Meganodontia by having a smaller and thinner anterior adductor muscle scar, a more swollen umbo, a straighter hinge and some secondary pallial attachment scars ( Bouchet and Cosel 2004; Taylor and Glover 2005). In addition, most Recent species of Pegophysema come from very shallow water sites, whereas fossil and Recent Meganodontia species come from deep-sea vent and seep sites ( Bouchet and Cosel 2004; Taylor and Glover 2005, 2016; Kiel and Hansen 2015; Kiel and Taviani 2017).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.