Sphex nigrohirtus
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2022.796.1665 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:76C5C9C4-C6C1-4EDC-8FF8-9828A6EF2040 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6359738 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C20928-FF9F-FFB3-40C5-1612393A0FB5 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Sphex nigrohirtus |
status |
|
Key B: Species of the Sphex nigrohirtus group
1. Propodeal setae golden or silvery-golden, obscuring sculpture completely .................................... .................................................................................................................. S. ahasverus Kohl, 1890
– Propodeal setae black or silvery-white, leaving sculpture partially visible.................................2
2. Female: body length> 28 mm; mandible black with only small dark ferruginous stripe centrally; conspicuous clypeal indentation. Male: flagellomeres IV–VII with broad placoids covering their entire length; apical part of penis valvae dorsolaterally with concave emargination ( Figs 79–80 View Figs 79–84. 79–80 ) .............................................................................................................. S. camerunicus Strand, 1916
– Female: body length <28 mm; basal half of mandible bright ferruginous; smaller clypeal indentation. Male: flagellomere V or VI with narrow placoid; apical part of penis valvae dorsolaterally flat or convex ( Figs 81–82 View Figs 79–84. 79–80 )...........................................................................................3
3. Significant portion of erect setae on inner part of propodeal enclosure silvery ( Fig. 85 View Figs 85–92. 85–86 ). Male: cellular wing area partially hyaline, with pale violet iridescence ..................................................... ........................................................................................................... S. incomptus Gerstaecker, 1871
– Erect setae on propodeal enclosure black, silvery near posterior margin at most ( Fig. 86 View Figs 85–92. 85–86 ). Male: cellular wing area uniformly slightly fuscous, with conspicuous purple ( Fig. 87 View Figs 85–92. 85–86 ) or cyan-violet iridescence..........................................................................................................................................4
4. Wings with cyan iridescence. Female: appressed setae posterolaterally on collar and propodeum and erect setae on posterior propodeal margin uniformly black ( Fig. 84 View Figs 79–84. 79–80 ) .......................................... .................................................................................................................... S. nigrohirtus Kohl, 1895
– Wings without any cyan iridescence. Female: appressed setae posterolaterally on collar and propodeum and erect setae on posterior propodeal margin silvery ( Fig. 86 View Figs 85–92. 85–86 ). Male: iridescence on forewing Byzantium-colored ( Fig. 87 View Figs 85–92. 85–86 ) .................................................... S. pulawskii sp. nov.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |