Sinophorus Förster
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5061.1.5 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6305FF20-EAC4-462F-BEB3-B6127AE6BD0B |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5699478 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C287EA-FF88-7A5F-FF77-49E87CF8FEAF |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Sinophorus Förster |
| status |
|
Key to species of Sinophorus Förster View in CoL View at ENA from China (females)
1. Malar space as long as basal width of mandible; fore wing vein 2m-cu straight; second metasomal tergite strongly compressed.......................................................................... S. psycheae Sonan, 1939 View in CoL
-. Malar space distinctly shorter than basal width of mandible; fore wing vein 2m-cu curved; second metasomal tergite depressed............................................................................................. 2
2. All carinae of propodeum strongly developed ( Fig. 8D View FIGURE 8 ); hind tibia not banded ( Fig.7 View FIGURE 7 ), yellowish brown to black.......... 3
-. Some carinae of propodeum usually less developed than others ( Fig. 6D View FIGURE 6 ); hind tibia banded ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 )................... 4
3. Interocellar distance 1.4–1.5× ocello-ocular distance; Temple 1.0× as long as eyes in lateral view; hind wing with 1-cu vein inclivous; mandible and tegula black; hind femur entirely black and 5.0–5.2× longer than wide....... S. nigrus Sheng, 2015
-. Interocellar distance 2.0× ocello-ocular distance ( Fig. 8G View FIGURE 8 ); temple 0.5× as long as eyes in lateral view; hind wing with 1-cu vein reclivous ( Fig. 8B View FIGURE 8 ); mandible yellowish brown ( Fig. 8F View FIGURE 8 ), tegula yellow ( Fig. 8H View FIGURE 8 ); hind femur yellowish brown and 4.0× longer than wide.......................................................................... S. petilidentis sp. nov.
4. Lateral groove of first metasomal tergite indistinct or absent................................................... 5
-. Lateral groove of first metasomal tergite distinct............................................................. 9
5. All carinae of propodeum strongly developed ( Fig. 2D View FIGURE 2 ); hind femur ca 4.8× longer than wide; face rugose-punctate ( Fig. 2F View FIGURE 2 ).................................................................................. S. dioryctriae sp. nov.
-. Some carinae of propodeum less developed than others ( Fig.6D View FIGURE 6 ); hind femur less than 4.8× longer than wide (except S. neimengensis sp. nov.); face punctate or rugose-punctate............................................................ 6
6. Upper tooth of mandible longer than lower tooth; antero-median area of clypeus flattened; hind tarsal claw with 5–8 teeth; petiole of metasoma 1.2–1.3× longer than postpetiole......................................................... 7
-. Upper tooth of mandible as long as lower tooth; antero-median area of clypeus convex; hind tarsal claw with 3–4 teeth; petiole of metasoma 1.5–1.7× longer than postpetiole............................................................... 8
7. Antenna with 31–35 flagellomeres; face punctate; ovipositor 2.1–2.3× longer than hind femur, its depth less than width of hind first tarsomere................................................................. S. pleuralis (Thomson, 1887) View in CoL
-. Antenna with 42–44 flagellomeres; face rugose-punctate; ovipositor 1.9–2.0× longer than hind femur, its depth greater than width of hind first tarsomere................................................... S. fuscicarpus (Thomson, 1887) View in CoL
8. Antenna with 43 flagellomeres; face and frons rugose-punctate ( Fig. 10F View FIGURE 10 ); interocellar distance 1.5× ocello-ocular distance ( Fig. 10G View FIGURE 10 ); fore wing areolet emitting 2m-cu vein from its basal part ( Fig. 10A View FIGURE 10 ); vein 1cu-a slightly distad of M&RS ( Fig. 10A View FIGURE 10 ); hind wing with CU&cu-a slightly reclivous ( Fig. 10B View FIGURE 10 ); hind femur ca 4.1× longer than wide...... S. spissus sp. nov.
-. Antenna with 35 flagellomeres; face punctate ( Fig. 6F View FIGURE 6 ); frons granulose-rugulose; interocellar distance 2.2× ocello-ocular distance ( Fig. 6G View FIGURE 6 ); fore wing areolet emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part ( Fig. 6A View FIGURE 6 ); vein 1cu-a opposite of M&RS ( Fig. 6A View FIGURE 6 ); hind wing with CU&cu-a vertical ( Fig. 6B View FIGURE 6 ); hind femur ca 4.8× longer than wide............... S. neimengensis sp. nov.
9. Hind wing CU&cu-a reclivous, not intercepted ( Fig. 4B View FIGURE 4 ); lateral longitudinal carina of propodeum weak ( Fig. 4D View FIGURE 4 ); hind tarsal claw with 2 slanting teeth; first metasomal segment with petiole ca 1.6× longer than postpetiole....... S. latistrigis sp. nov.
-. Hind wing CU&cu-a vertical to inclivous, intercepted; lateral longitudinal carina of propodeum usually strong; hind tarsal claw usually with more than 2 slanting teeth; first metasomal segment with petiole less than 1.6× longer than postpetiole...... 10
10. Upper tooth of mandible as long as lower tooth; all carinae of propodeum strong; hind femur 3.9–4.2× longer than wide; hind tarsal claw usually without teeth, if teeth present, then less than 3 teeth......................................... 11
-. Upper tooth of mandible longer than lower tooth; usually some carinae of propodeum weaker than others; hind femur 4.2–5.3× longer than wide; hind tarsal claw with more than 3 teeth..................................................... 12
11. Narrowest width of face ca 0.9× total length of face and clypeus; fore wing areolet emitting 2m-cu vein from its middle; hind wing vein 1-cu ca 7.5× longer than cu-a; ovipositor sheath ca as long as first metasomal tergite, 0.8× as long as hind femur, 0.6× length of hind tibia; ovipositor straight; tegula yellow..................................... S. bazariae Sheng, 2015
-. Narrowest width of face ca 1.2× total length of face and clypeus; fore wing areolet emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical; hind wing vein 1-cu ca 3.0–4.0× longer than cu-a; ovipositor sheath 1.7–1.8× longer than first tergite, 1.4–1.5× longer than hind femur, approximately 1.2× length of hind tibia; ovipositor strongly upcurved; tegula blackish brown.................................................................................................. S. zeirapherae Sheng, 2015
12. Hind wing vein cu-a absent, with CU&cu-a not intercepted; hind tibia ferruginous medially; tegula yellowish brown to brown........................................................................... S. turionus (Ratzeburg, 1844)
-. Hind wing vein cu-a present, with CU&cu-a usually intercepted; hind tibia at least white to yellowish brown externo-medially; tegula white to brown................................................................................. 13
13. Hind femur 5.1–5.3× longer than wide; ovipositor depth at mid-length 0.7–0.8× width of hind first tarsomere; costula of propodeum strong and lateromedian longitudinal carina moderately strong.............. S. impunctatus Sheng & Sun, 2014
-. Hind femur 4.2–4.7× longer than wide (except 4.9–5.2× longer than wide in S. geniculatus View in CoL ); ovipositor depth at mid-length slightly longer than width of hind first tarsomere; costula of propodeum absent to strong and lateromedian longitudinal carina variable............................................................................................ 14
14. Hind femur 4.9–5.2× longer than wide; ovipositor depth at mid-length slightly longer than width of hind first tarsomere; antenna with 34–39 flagellomeres; propodeal costula strong......................... S. geniculatus (Gravenhorst, 1829) View in CoL
-. Hind femur 4.2–4.7× longer than wide; ovipositor depth at mid-length at most equal to width of hind first tarsomere; antenna with 31–35 flagellomeres; propodeal costula variable........................................................ 15
15. Temple 0.6–0.9× as long as eyes in lateral view; punctures of lower half of mesopleuron separated by 1.0–1.5× their diameter; ovipositor strongly upcurved, with depth at mid-length less than width of hind first tarsomere.. S. exartemae (Uchida, 1928) View in CoL
-. Temple 0.5–0.6× as long as eyes in lateral view; punctures of lower half of mesopleuron separated by less than their diameter; ovipositor moderately upcurved, with depth at mid-length equal to width of hind first tarsomere...................... 16
16. Propodeal costula present; lateromedian longitudinal carina moderately strong; hind femur ca 4.2× longer than wide; postpetiole of first, second and third metasomal tergites rufous.................................. S. katoensis Sanborne, 1986 View in CoL
-. Propodeal costula absent; lateromedian longitudinal carina weak; hind femur ca 4.7× longer than wide; metasoma entirely black........................................................................ S. wushensis Sanborne, 1990 View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |