Toxoplasma gondii (Nicolle & Manceaux, 1908)

Hollings, Tracey, Jones, Menna, Mooney, Nick & McCallum, Hamish, 2013, Wildlife disease ecology in changing landscapes: Mesopredator release and toxoplasmosis, International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 2 (1), pp. 110-118 : 112

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2013.02.002

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C2B768-8627-574E-FC9D-B209FDE6FAC5

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Toxoplasma gondii
status

 

2.2. Testing for T. gondii

We tested blood samples for IgG antibodies, the class of antibodies representing the secondary immune response, using a modified agglutination test (MAT) (BioMerieux, France). The addition of beta-mercaptoethanol in the MAT test destroys non-specific IgM antibodies, reducing the risk of false-positive results ( Desmonts and Remington, 1980). MAT testing has been used extensively for detection of exposure to T. gondii in marsupials ( Obendorf et al., 1996; Hartley and English, 2005; Eymann et al., 2006; Parameswaran et al., 2009a), as it does not require a species specific reagent and is highly sensitive. The MAT test has high specificity and there is no evidence for cross-reactivity with related organisms ( Dubey et al., 1995; Dubey, 1997). Samples were tested at three different sera dilutions; 1:16, 1:64, 1:256. A positive reaction was acknowledged if agglutination occurred at a sera dilution of at least 1:64 ( Obendorf et al., 1996; Hartley, 2006). A subsample of blood sera (5%) was retested with the MAT test for verification at the Animal Health Laboratory of the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment (DPIPWE), Tasmania.

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF