Data, Walker, 1862
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222933.2016.1262078 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C2E252-FFED-6F58-BEF1-A843FBE6B577 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Data |
status |
|
Data View in CoL analysis
To test our hypothesis that the repetition rate of each visual display (response variable) would differ between treatments (predictor variable with two levels: Self Image and Control), we used repeated-measures analyses of variance ( Sokal and Rohlf 1995) with interaction between treatments and the species sampled. As we were interested in how each behavioural response changed between the treatments, each response variable was tested separately ( Huberty and Morris 1989). Statistical tests were performed and graphs were generated in the software R, version 3.2.0 (R Development Core Team 2015).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.