Data, Walker, 1862

Furtado, Raíssa, Márquez, Rafael & Hartz, Sandra Maria, 2016, In front of a mirror: visual displays may not be aggressive signals in nocturnal tree frogs, Journal of Natural History 51 (7 - 8), pp. 443-454 : 447

publication ID	https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2016.1262078
persistent identifier	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C2E252-FFED-6F58-BEF1-A843FBE6B577
treatment provided by	Felipe (2021-08-12 02:51:04, last updated by Plazi 2023-11-03 22:37:45)
scientific name	Data
status

Treatment

Data View in CoL analysis

To test our hypothesis that the repetition rate of each visual display (response variable) would differ between treatments (predictor variable with two levels: Self Image and Control), we used repeated-measures analyses of variance ( Sokal and Rohlf 1995) with interaction between treatments and the species sampled. As we were interested in how each behavioural response changed between the treatments, each response variable was tested separately ( Huberty and Morris 1989). Statistical tests were performed and graphs were generated in the software R, version 3.2.0 (R Development Core Team 2015).

References

R Development Core Team. 2015. R: a language and environment for statistical computing [Internet]. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [cited 2015 Oct 8]. Available from: http: // www. r-project. org

Huberty CJ, Morris JD. 1989. Multivariate analysis versus multiple univariate analyses. Psychol Bull. 105: 302 - 308.

Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. 1995. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. New York (NY): W. H. Freeman and Company.