Bianor Peckham et Peckham, 1885
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3897/zookeys.16.227 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6E8BA40D-318D-4F1B-A194-63991E40F0E3 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3791698 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C3A265-8009-FFC1-8082-327A7E1F79F1 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Bianor Peckham et Peckham, 1885 |
status |
|
Bianor Peckham et Peckham, 1885 View in CoL View at ENA
Bianor is the largest genus of the Harmochireae, consisting of 21 valid species ( Table 1 View Table 1 ), with the majority of them occurring in the Ethiopian or Oriental Regions. Six additional species have uncertain taxonomic status or are invalid ( Table 2 View Table 2 ). In the light of findings of a new Bianor species from Madagascar and of new records of B. kovaczi from Botswana (see below), of which females are practically identical to those of B. albobimaculatus (cf. Figs 13-14 View Figures 10-14 and figs 19-27, 36- 46 in Logunov 2001), it is worth reconsidering the taxonomic status of B. rusticulus Peckham et Peckham, 1903 (known from the ♀ holotype), which was synonymized with B. albobimaculatus by Logunov (2001). Yet, such reconsideration will only be possible pending collection of a series of both sexes from the type locality of B. rusticulus , given on the original label as ‘Clanwilliam, Cape Colony’.
With a few exceptions (e.g., B. biocellosus Simon, 1902 ), species of Bianor cannot be reliably diagnosed from the female copulatory organs alone because of a wide range of intraspecific variation (for details, see Logunov 2001: p. 222). Therefore, descriptions based on single females are hardly sufficient for proper diagnoses of Bianor species. Yet, such descriptions continue to appear ( Jastrzębski 2007; Wesołowska and van Harten 2002).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.