Trichochermes Kirkaldy, 1904
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5177.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7DD15C3E-69F3-41A8-AB51-BA79CEC058F6 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7022233 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C40C49-F953-FF81-2387-FCE850E2FB20 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Trichochermes Kirkaldy, 1904 |
status |
|
Trichochermes Kirkaldy, 1904 View in CoL View at ENA , sensu novo
Comments. In the «best ML tree» of Percy et al. (2018: Figure S2 View FIGURES 2‒5 ), Trichochermes walkeri ( Foerster, 1848) and Trioza rhamni ( Schrank, 1801) constitute a strongly supported monophyletic group and both are associated with Rhamnus . The two species share the weakly inclined head, the long genal processes which are slightly constricted basally, the 1+3 apical metatibial spurs, the long, relatively narrow, apically pointed forewings with a long undulating vein Rs, and the relatively massive male proctiger. These morphological characters and the host genus are shared with Trioza naria Kwon, Suh, An & Huh, 1996c , Trioza marginepunctata Flor, 1861 and Trioza rhamnisuga Li, 1994 , suggesting that they all are congeneric. We propose following new combinations: Trichochermes marginepunctatus (Flor, 1861) , comb. nov., Trichochermes rhamni ( Schrank, 1801) , comb. nov. and Trichochermes rhamnisugus (Li, 1994) , comb. nov. For Trioza naria see below. Apart from the Palaearctic species, Ouvrard (2020) also lists one Afrotropical and three Neotropical Trichochermes species which do not fit the above description and may not be congeneric with T. walkeri , the type species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.