Mediothele Raven & Platnick, 1978 : 74
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.281994 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6170353 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C43846-FFCD-2273-6AC2-FAA27D84FC53 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Mediothele Raven & Platnick, 1978 : 74 |
status |
|
Mediothele Raven & Platnick, 1978: 74 View in CoL View at ENA .
Until now, the genus Mediothele included a single species, M. australis , described from a single male from Southern Chile; no further males are known of the genus. The genus was originally included in Dipluridae , but later transferred ( Raven, 1985) to Hexathelidae , proposing Scotinoecus as its sister group.
In this genus, morphological differences between species are more marked than in Scotinoecus , especially in leg, cephalothorax and sternum shape, and chaetotaxy. The much simpler spermathecae have only minor differences between species (often within the observed range of individual variation among specimens of a single locality).
Type species. Mediothele australis Raven & Platnick, 1978
Diagnosis. Differs from Scotinoecus in the labium and maxillae having few (female) or no (male) cuspules; fangs with basal outer tooth. PLS spinnerets short, ALS two-segmented much shorter than PMS; thickened femora III; patellae III with strong prolateral spines; patellae III and IV with many prolateral and dorsal anterior strong setae. Male tibia I with one large and one small spur, and associated thorn on metatarsus; bulb pyriform, without conductor.
Many of these somatic characters (fang tooth, shorter spinnerets, thickened femora, and patellae with strong spines and setae) are probably associated with a burrowing lifestyle.
Habits. Spiders of all known species live in small silk-lined burrows with an open entrance.
Monophyly. By out-group comparison, essentially all of the characters in which it differs from Scotinecus are synapomorphies of Mediothele . The monophyly of the genus is thus well established. The low numbers of labial (and maxillary) cuspules are best interpreted as a reversal, as (according to Raven’s 1978, 1985 hypotheses of hexathelid relationships) they occur in several successive sister groups.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Mediothele Raven & Platnick, 1978 : 74
T, Duniesky Rios & Goloboff, Pablo A. 2012 |
Mediothele
Raven 1978: 74 |