Ramazzottius bunikowskae, Kaczmarek, Łukasz, Michalczyk, Łukasz & Diduszko, Dawid, 2006
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.273437 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5698150 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C487AF-F577-0A20-CE00-8EE87941DAD6 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Ramazzottius bunikowskae |
status |
sp. nov. |
Ramazzottius bunikowskae View in CoL sp. nov.
( Figs. 1–17 View FIGURES 1 – 2 View FIGURES 3 – 4 View FIGURES 5 – 8 View FIGURES 9 – 12 View FIGURES 13 – 15 View FIGURES 16 – 17 )
Description
Adult (measurements of holotype): Body length 222.0 ( Figs. 1–3 View FIGURES 1 – 2 View FIGURES 3 – 4 ). Body red due to pigmented transverse bands on dorsal side. Dorsal cuticle with well visible, polygonal tubercles (1.0–3.0 in diameter) clearly larger in posterior part of the body ( Figs. 4–5 View FIGURES 3 – 4 View FIGURES 5 – 8 ). Tubercles arranged in 8 transverse bands. Granulation on legs absent except for a stripe with small tubercles present on the external parts of legs IV.
Eyes absent. Head with two elliptical organs on posterior dorsolateral sides of head ( Figs. 6–7, 8 View FIGURES 5 – 8 , arrow a). Elliptical organs with some pores (visible in SEM only, Fig. 6 View FIGURES 5 – 8 ). On anterior dorsolateral sides of head two strongly porous areas which could be external parts of chemoreceptors (visible in SEM only) ( Figs. 6 View FIGURES 5 – 8 , 9 View FIGURES 9 – 12 ). Mouth opening anteroventral, surrounded by six somewhat indistinct peribuccal lobes and also six small and sometimes undeveloped peribuccal papillae, placed in between lobes (visible in SEM only) ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 9 – 12 ).
Buccopharyngeal apparatus of Ramazzottius type ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 13 – 15 ) with apophyses for insertion of the stylet muscles blunthook shaped, asymmetrical in size and shape, with respect to the frontal plane. Oral cavity armature poorly developed and hardly visible in PCM. Only one band of very small, conical teeth, arranged in 3–5 rows present. Teeth located on ring fold, in posterior oral cavity. Buccal tube 29.5 long ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 13 – 15 ). Buccal tube width: internal 1.0 [3.4], external 2.0 [7.0] with one bend in posterior part of tube (visible only in lateral view). Stylet supports inserted on buccal tube at 16.5 [56.0]. Pharyngeal bulb slightly oval with apophyses and two macroplacoids ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 13 – 15 ). Microplacoid and septula absent. Pharyngeal apophyses very large (almost as large as macroplacoids) and triangular in shape. Macroplacoids slightly oval, without constrictions. First macroplacoid 3.0 [10.2] long. Second macroplacoid shorter, 2.0 [7.0] long. Macroplacoid row 6.0 [20.3] long.
Claws of Ramazzottius type, ( Figs. 11–12 View FIGURES 9 – 12 , 14–15 View FIGURES 13 – 15 ). Primary branches of external claws long and thin, not connected with secondary branches ( Figs. 11–12 View FIGURES 9 – 12 ). Poorly visible lunules on all legs present, better developed on IV pair of legs. Accessory points on primary branches of all external and internal claws present. External (ext) claw of I pair of legs 14.0 [47.0] long, base (bs) of the claw 5.0 [16.9]; II ext ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 9 – 12 ). 16.0 [54.2], bs 6.0 [20.3]; III ext. 16.0 [54.2], bs 6.0 [20.3]; IV ext. 19.0 [64.4], bs 6.0 [20.3], internal 9.0 [30.5]. Bars and other cuticular thickenings on legs absent.
Egg: White/colourless, large laid freely ( Figs. 16–17 View FIGURES 16 – 17 ). Spherical, with conical processes with very small enlarged, bulbous base. Egg processes situated very close to each other (sometimes in contact). Some processes with bifurcated tips ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 16 – 17 ). Egg processes and surface between processes probably smooth (in LM). Diameter of egg without processes 85.0 and 104.0 including them. Processes 11.0–17.0 high with basal diameter 5.0–7.0.
Remarks
Results of simple statistical analysis of measurements and pt values of selected morphological structures for eight specimens are given in Table 1 View TABLE 1 . The peribuccal lobes, papillae and porous areas on the head have never been reported in the genus Ramazzottius before, therefore it is not known if these structures are also present in other species of the genus. Processes on eggs seems to be surrounded by rings of small granules but this character should be confirmed based on larger number of eggs because it could be only an artifact.
Material examined
Twelve specimens and one egg, Russia, Irkutsk Province, northern part of Olhon Island on Lake Baikal, taiga, lichen from stone, near the coast, 05.08.2004; leg. D. Diduszko.
Type depositories. Holotype and 8 paratypes (7 adults and 1 egg) are deposited in the Natural History Collections, Faculty of Biology, A. Mickiewicz University, Umultowska
89, 61–614 oznań, Poland.
Etymology
The first author takes great pleasure in dedicating the new species to a beautiful, incredible and close to him woman, Anna Bunikowska.
Differential diagnosis
Ramazzottius bunikowskae View in CoL sp. nov. is similar to R. caucasicus Biserov, 1998 View in CoL and R. tribulosus Bertolani & Rebecchi, 1988 View in CoL in regard to the shape of egg processes. The new species differs from R. caucasicus View in CoL by:
1. the presence of sculpture on the dorsal side of the body and by very densely arranged egg processes (in R. caucasicus View in CoL the processes are more spaced).
2. shorter external claws (19.0–32.0 in R. caucasicus and 18.0–20.0 in the new species).
3. different colour of the body (brown in R. caucasicus and red in the new species).
4. larger egg diameter (without processes): 55.0–63.0 in R. caucasicus and 85.0 in the new species.
Ramazzottius bunikowskae sp. nov. differs from R. tribulosus by:
1. longer (7.7–9.6 in R. tribulosus and 11.0–17.0 in the new species) and wider base of the egg processes (3.9–4.2 in R. tribulosus and 5.0.0–7.0 in the new species).
2. very densely arranged egg processes (in R. tribulosus the processes are more spaced).
3. bulbous base and conical apices of egg processes (processes conical without bulbous base in R. tribulosus ).
4. larger egg diameter (without processes): 53.8–59.0 in R. tribulosus and 85.0 in the new species.
5. shorter claws:
a) leg I external/internal (18.5/ 11.1 in R. tribulosus (specimen 287.1 long) and 14.5/9.0 in the new species (specimen 285.0 long));
b) leg II internal (11.4 in R. tribulosus (specimen 287.1 long) and 9.0 in the new species (specimen 285.0 long));
c) leg IV external/internal (22.8/ 12.9 in R. tribulosus (specimen 287.1 long) and 20/ 10.0 in the new species (specimen 285.0 long)).
CHARACTER | N | RANGE | MEAN | SD |
---|---|---|---|---|
µm pt | µm pt | µm pt | ||
Body | 8 | 222.0– 357.0 752.5– 1084.7 | 298.0 941.0 | 40.9 100.4 |
Buccaltube | 8 | 29.5– 37.5 | 31.7 | 3.2 |
Stylet support insertion point | 8 | 16.5– 21.0 53.2– 57.6 | 17.6 55.6 | 1.8 1.2 |
Buccal tube internal width | 8 | 1.0– 1.0 2.7– 3.4 | 1.0 3.2 | 0.0 0.3 |
Buccal tube external width | 8 | 2.0– 3.0 6.8– 8.1 | 2.3 7.3 | 0.4 0.6 |
Macroplacoid 1 | 8 | 2.5– 4.0 8.3– 10.7 | 3.1 9.7 | 0.4 0.8 |
Macroplacoid 2 | 8 | 2.0– 3.0 5.6– 8.0 | 2.1 6.7 | 0.4 0.7 |
Placoid row | 8 | 6.0– 8.0 19.4– 23.7 | 6.8 21.3 | 0.7 1.5 |
Claw 1 external | 6 | 14.0– 21.0 47.5– 67.7 | 16.6 53.1 | 3.4 7.8 |
Claw 1 external base | 6 | 4.0– 7.0 13.6– 22.6 | 5.6 17.9 | 1.2 3.0 |
Claw 1 internal | 7 | 7.0– 10.0 23.7– 32.3 | 8.9 27.8 | 1.1 3.2 |
Claw 1 internal base | 7 | 5.0– 12.0 16.9– 32.0 | 7.9 24.2 | 2.5 5.8 |
Claw 2 external | 6 | 15.0– 22.0 50.8– 58.7 | 16.7 53.4 | 2.7 3.0 |
Claw 2 external base | 6 | 5.0– 7.0 16.9– 20.3 | 5.8 18.8 | 0.8 1.5 |
Claw 2 internal | 6 | 8.5– 11.0 24.0– 35.5 | 9.6 30.0 | 1.1 3.7 |
Claw 2 internal base | 6 | 6.5– 12.0 22.0– 32.3 | 8.6 26.5 | 2.2 4.5 |
Claw 3 external | 6 | 16.0– 19.0 54.2– 61.3 | 17.3 57.5 | 1.1 2.4 |
Claw 3 external base | 6 | 6.0– 9.0 20.3– 29.0 | 6.8 22.7 | 1.2 3.4 |
Claw 3 internal | 6 | 9.0– 12.0 27.8– 35.5 | 10.0 31.1 | 1.3 2.5 |
Claw 3 internal base | 6 | 7.0– 9.0 22.2– 29.0 | 8.0 25.0 | 0.9 2.6 |
Claw 4 external | 7 | 18.0– 20.0 55.6– 67.8 | 19.3 62.7 | 1.0 3.9 |
Claw 4 external base | 7 | 6.0– 8.0 20.3– 25.8 | 6.7 21.7 | 1.0 2.1 |
Claw 4 internal | 8 | 9.0– 12.0 27.8– 35.5 | 10.3 32.4 | 1.0 2.7 |
Claw 4 internal base | 8 | 7.0– 9.0 23.7– 30.5 | 8.5 26.9 | 0.8 2.5 |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Ramazzottius bunikowskae
Kaczmarek, Łukasz, Michalczyk, Łukasz & Diduszko, Dawid 2006 |
R. caucasicus
Biserov 1998 |
R. tribulosus
Bertolani & Rebecchi 1988 |