Gyrosigma cf. obscurum (W. Smith) Griffith et Henfrey
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1515/bot-2021-0066 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11000235 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C487C5-430B-737F-FCEF-FD6E775E9A31 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Gyrosigma cf. obscurum (W. Smith) Griffith et Henfrey |
status |
|
Gyrosigma cf. obscurum (W. Smith) Griffith et Henfrey ( Figure 81 View Figures 79–92 )
Literature: ( Krammer and Lange-Bertalot 1986, p. 299, fig. 116: 1, 2; Patrick and Reimer 1966, p. 346, pl. 24, fig. 7).
Description: Length 144–170 µm, width 9–11 µm, transverse striae 28–30 in 10 µm.
Remarks: There has been controversial debate on whether this species belongs to Gyrosigma or Pleurosigma ( Reid 2004; Sterrenburg 1993, 2003) based on the angle of striae crossing in the center of the valve. The transverse striae which cross the apical axis at 90° can be easily seen under LM but the oblique striae were very difficult to resolve. According to Reid (2004), molecular analysis supports placing this species in Gyrosigma which is followed here. The observed specimens matched well the description of G. obscurum but as this species is considered freshwater, doubt arose. According to Sterrenburg (2003), marine records of this species were inaccurate.
Ecology and distribution: This species appeared in large numbers in Potter Cove but have not been observed in previous collections.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |