Scolecodespugetensis, Kim & Boxshall, 2020

Kim, Il-Hoi & Boxshall, Geoff A., 2020, Untold diversity: the astonishing species richness of the Notodelphyidae (Copepoda: Cyclopoida), a family of symbiotic copepods associated with ascidians (Tunicata), Megataxa 4 (1), pp. 1-6 : 603-605

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/megataxa.4.1.1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4591347

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C487CB-ED0B-3869-FCEF-FE10FBD5FBBE

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Scolecodespugetensis
status

sp. nov.

Scolecodespugetensis sp. nov.

( Figs. 406 View FIGURE 406 , 407 View FIGURE 407 )

Typematerial. Holotype (intact ♀, MNHN-IU-2014- 21436 ) , paratypes (8 intact ♀♀, MNHN-IU-2014- 21437), and dissected paratypes (3 ♀♀, figured) in thin membranous cysts in a solitary ascidian, Pyura sp., Puget Sound, Washington, USA.

Etymology. The name of the new species refers to its type locality.

Descriptionoffemale. Body ( Fig. 406A View FIGURE 406 ) elongate, cylindrical, straight or curved, consisting of prosome and unsegmented free abdomen. Body length variable, 9.25 mmin relatively small, figured specimen; body width 0.93 mm. Prosome unsegmented: cephalosome notarticulated from remaining part of prosome, but discernible by lateral expansions( Fig.406B View FIGURE 406 );antennalandrostralregionnarrow. All legs inserted in pedigerous region confined to anterior part of prosome. Genital openings present in posterior region of prosome. Abdomen ( Fig. 406C View FIGURE 406 ) unsegmented, as long as wide, positioned posteroventrally on prosome. Caudal rami ( Fig. 406D View FIGURE 406 ) 2.6 timeslongerthan wide (140×54 μm), narrowing in middle and ornamented with numerous papillae scattered over surface: armed with 6 setae (2 outer lateral, 2 subdistal, and 2 distal).

Rostrum ( Fig. 406E View FIGURE 406 ) evenly tapering, aslongas wide. Antennule ( Fig. 406F View FIGURE 406 ) unsegmented but clearly divisible into 2 parts; proximal part extremely swollen, globular, armed with 3 small setae distally; distal part narrow, digitiform, armed with 11 setae and 1 aesthetasc. Antenna ( Fig. 406G View FIGURE 406 ) 3-segmented; coxa and basis broad and unarmed; unsegmentedendopod bearing 2 inner and 3 or 4 outer, minute setae, plus straight terminal claw.

Labrum hardly observable. Mouthparts consisting of mandible, maxillule, and maxilla, all represented by unsegmented lobes bearing plumose setae. Mandible ( Fig. 406H View FIGURE 406 ) with 3 long medial and 2 to 4 (3 is common) shorter apical setae. Maxillule ( Fig. 406I View FIGURE 406 ) with 3 long and 3 short setae (2 medial, 3 apical, and 1 outer). Maxilla ( Fig. 406J View FIGURE 406 ) consisting of broader proximal half and narrower distal half (interpretable as 2-segmented condition depending on viewing angle), armed with 1 seta proximally and 3 setaeon apex; ornamented 2 patches of setules and more than 10 papillae. Maxilliped absent.

Legs 1–4 ( Figs. 406K, L View FIGURE 406 , 407A, B View FIGURE 407 ) biramous, each with incompletely 2-segmented protopod, 2-segmented exopod, and unsegmented endopod. Protopods of legs 1– 4 each with outer seta derived from basis; other armature elements absent. All setae on rami short and broad, with nipple-like tip. Number of setae variable between individuals and between left and right legs in single individual. Armature formula for legs 1–4 as follows:

  Protopod Exopod Endopod
Leg 1 1-0 1-0; 8 to 9 11 to 14
Leg 2 1-0 1-0; 11 to 17 15 to 21
Leg 3 1-0 1-0; 15 to 16 15 to 19
Leg 4 1-0 1-0; 15 to 17 15 to 19
Leg 5 absent.    

Male. Unknown.

Remarks. Scolecodes pugetensis sp. nov. is similar to the type species, S. huntsmani and both species can inhabit solitary ascidians of the same genus ( Pyura ) in the same zoogeographic region. The number of setae on the swimminglegsobservedby Illg (1958, 1970b) fallswithin the range of variability exhibited in our material. The mandible, maxillule, and maxilla of female S. huntsmani illustrated by Dudley (1966) are not significantly different from these limbs in our specimens. Despite these similarities and the variability observed, these two species are not conspecific because the exopods of legs 1–4 are 2-segmented in S. pugetensis sp. nov., but only 1-segmented in adults of S. huntsmani as described by Illg (1958) and illustrated by Illg (1970b). Dudley (1966) also recorded 1-segmented rami inlegs 1–4 of the female copepodid V of S. huntsmani . The segmentation does not appear to exhibit variability and we therefore establish a new species to accommodate the form with 2-segmented exopods in legs 1–4.

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF