Demoixys cornuta, Kim & Boxshall, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/megataxa.4.1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6422147 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C487CB-ED77-381C-FCEF-F969FEA2FC17 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Demoixys cornuta |
status |
sp. nov. |
Demoixys cornuta sp. nov.
( Figs. 369 View FIGURE 369 , 370 View FIGURE 370 )
Typematerial. Holotype (intact ♀, MNHN-IU-2014- 21409 ) , paratypes (2 intact ♀♀, MNHN-IU-2014- 21410), and dissected paratypes (3 ♀♀, figured) from Pseudodistoma arborescens Millar, 1967 (MNHN-IT-2018-11 = MNHNA 1/ PSE /80), ATIMOVATAE TA 28, Banc Tozer, Madagascar (25°12 Ś, 44°08 É), depth 20-22 m, MNHN coll., 25 May 2010.
Etymology. The specific name is derived from the Latin cornut (=horned), referring to the possession by the new species of the posterolateral horn-like processes on the dorsal cephalic shield.
Descriptionoffemale. Body ( Fig. 369A View FIGURE 369 ) stout, inflated; body length 1.65 mm. Cephalosome indistinctly defined from metasome, dorsal cephalic shield with paired posterolateral horn-like processes; each process ( Fig. 369D View FIGURE 369 ) sclerotized, bent dorsally in middle and with pointed tip. Metasome gradually broadening posteriorly, longer than wide, unsegmented, but with 2 constrictions delimiting first to third pedigerous somites. Free urosome ( Fig. 369B View FIGURE 369 ) small, slightly shorter than wide, 2-segmented, consisting of genital complex and unsegmented abdomen. Genital complex subdivided by lateral constriction. Caudal rami ( Fig. 369C View FIGURE 369 ) rudimentary, lobate, fused with abdomen; armedwith few minute setal vestiges distally.
Rostrum ( Fig. 369F View FIGURE 369 ) large, elongate, extending to middle of labrum ( Fig. 369E View FIGURE 369 ). Antennule ( Fig. 369G View FIGURE 369 ) small, strongly tapering, 5-segmented; first to fifth segments armed with 0, 1, 2, 1, and 3 minute setae, respectively; terminal segment with several setules in addition to setae. Antenna ( Fig. 369H View FIGURE 369 ) 3-segmented, consistingof coxa, basis, and unsegmented endopod; coxa and basis unarmed; endopod distinctly narrower and shorter than basis and 2.1 times longer than wide (38×18 μm); armed with 1 small seta distally plus small terminal claw bearing minute spinules distally.
Labrum ( Fig. 369I View FIGURE 369 ) as simple, smooth and convex plate. Mandible ( Fig. 369J View FIGURE 369 ) consistingof coxa and palp: coxal gnathobase with broad medial margin bearing 5 teeth distally and with pectinate proximal part (second and fourth teeth smaller than other 3); proximal corner of gnathobase acutely pointed: palp reduced, consisting of basis and small 1-segmented rami; basis with 1 small setaat mediodistal corner; exopod wider than long, incompletely articulated from basis, armed with 2 short setae distally; endopod as long as wide, with 2 small distal setae. Maxillule ( Fig. 369K View FIGURE 369 ) extremely simplified and indistinctly bilobed, lobes with 1 seta and 5 setae (3 distal and 2 outer). Maxilla ( Fig. 369I View FIGURE 369 ) 3-segmented; syncoxa bearing 2 small setae; basis with large, highly sclerotized claw only; endopod small, knob-like with 3 small setae. Maxilliped ( Fig. 369M View FIGURE 369 ) lobate, bearing 2 smallsetae distally.
Legs 1–4 ( Fig. 370 View FIGURE 370 A-D) biramous, with 2-segmented protopods; ornamented with few scattered setules; rami incompletely 2-segmented, except unsegmented endopod of leg 1, and obscurely articulated from basis. Endopods much smaller than exopods. Leg 1 exopod with 2 minute, papilliform rudiments of spines, one on outer distal corner on first exopodal segment and another on outer margin of second segment. Exopods of legs 2–4 armed with 5 small, spinulose spines, one on first segment and 4 on second. Coxa, basis, and endopod of all swimming legs unarmed.
Leg 5 ( Fig. 369B View FIGURE 369 ) present on posteroventral surface of somite near base of urosome; represented by short, outer angular process and tapering, pointed inner process; both processes unarmed.
Male. Unknown.
Remarks. Based on the reduction in segmentation of the swimming leg rami and the general simplification of the mouthparts, combined with the retention of a welldeveloped, dentate coxal gnathobase on the mandible, this species is placed in the genus Demoixys . The new species can be readily distinguished from its congeners by its possession of a pair of posterolateral cephalic horns and by the extremely simplified mouthparts with, for example, the maxillule reduced to a bilobed vestige bearing a few setae.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
SubPhylum |
Tunicata |
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |