Nobinerilla alata, Kim & Boxshall, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/megataxa.4.1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5699825 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C487CB-EE47-3B23-FF4D-FCFDFC0AF8E9 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Nobinerilla alata |
status |
gen. et sp. nov. |
Nobinerilla alata gen. et sp. nov.
( Figs. 186 View FIGURE 186 , 187 View FIGURE 187 )
Typematerial. Holotype (intact ♀, MNHN-IU-2014- 21293 ) , paratypes (2 intact ♀♀, MNHN-IU-2014-21294), anddissectedparatype (♀, figured) from Pycnoclavella flava (Monniot F., 1988) Chenal du Îlot Canard , New Caledonia, NC 41, depth 22 m, 17 March 1987.
Etymology. From the Latin alat (=winged), referring to the presence of epimeral wings on the metasome.
Descriptionoffemale. Body ( Fig. 186A View FIGURE 186 ) small, compressed; length about 1.20 mm. Cephalosome welldefined. Metasomeunsegmented with 2 pairs of large wings (epimera) near bases of legs 2 and 3: wings incurved and separated from surface of metasome, forming attenuated posterodistal process withshort membrane along dorsal margin. Fifth pedigerous somite fused with metasome. Freeurosome ( Fig. 186B View FIGURE 186 ) 5-segmented: genital somite short but distinctly wider than abdomen; 4 abdominalsomites 53×115, 40×106, 40×102, and 49×90 μm, respectively. Caudalramus ( Fig. 186E View FIGURE 186 ) about 2.1 timeslongerthan wide (79×37 μm) and about 1.2 times longerthan anal somite, gradually narrowing distally: armed with 6 naked setae; outer lateral and dorsal setae located at 55 and 76% of ramus length; longest distal seta about 1.3 times longer than ramus, second longest seta nearly as long as ramus.
Coxa | Basis | Exopod | Endopod |
---|---|---|---|
Leg 1 0-0 | 1-I | I-1; I-1; III, I, 4 | 0-1; 0-1; 1, 2, 2 |
Leg 2 0-0 | 1-0 | 1-1; 1-1; 3, 1, 5 | 0-1; 0-2; 1, 2, 3 |
Left leg 3 0-1 | 1-0 | 1-1; 1-1; 2, 1, 5 | 0-1; 0-2; 1, 2, 3 |
Right leg 3 0-1 | 1-0 | 1-1; 1-1; 1, 1, 5 | 0-1; 0-2; 1, 2, 3 |
Left leg 4 0-0 | 1-0 | 1-0; 1-0; 2, 1, 4 | 0-0; 0-0; 1, 2, 2 |
Right leg 4 0-0 | 1-0 | 1-0; 1-1; 2, 1, 5 | 0-0; 0-1; 1, 2, 2 |
Rostrum ( Fig.186C View FIGURE 186 ) shortand wide, stronglytapering towardsobtuse apex.Antennule ( Fig.186D View FIGURE 186 ) ratherslender, 9-segmented; first and second segments not strongly expanded; eighth segment subdivided by incomplete suture line; armatureformula 3, 15, 6, 3+aesthetasc, 1, 3, 2+aesthetasc, 4+aesthetasc, and 7+aesthetasc; all setae naked. Antenna ( Fig. 186F View FIGURE 186 ) stout, 4-segmented; coxa and basis unarmed; first endopodal segment with small seta on inner margin; compound distal endopodal segment 40×21 μm, as long as first segment: armed with 8 setae plus large, stongly curved terminal claw, longer than segment.
Labrum very weak and destroyed during dissection. Mandible ( Fig. 186G View FIGURE 186 ) with 5 teeth on coxal gnathobase; basis with very small medial seta; exopod with 5 setae, distal outer seta shorter than other 4; endopod indistinctly articulated from basis, with 4 and 6 setae on first and second segments, respectively; outer distal seta on second endopodal segment shorter than other 5 setae. Paragnath ( Fig. 186H View FIGURE 186 ) with short, blunt process apically and setules onmedial margin. Maxillule ( Fig. 186I View FIGURE 186 ) with 9 setaeon arthrite, 1 on coxal endite, 2 on epipodite, 3 on basis and 4 each on exopod and endopod. Maxilla ( Fig. 186J View FIGURE 186 ) with 9 setae (grouped as 3, 1, 2,and 3) on syncoxa, clawplus 1 seta on basis, and 1, 1, and 2 setae on first to third endopodal segments, respectively. Maxilliped unsegmented ( Fig. 187A View FIGURE 187 ), lacking distal prolongation; armedwith 8 (4+4) setae medially and 1 outer distal seta.
Legs 1–4 ( Fig. 187 View FIGURE 187 B-F) with 3-segmented rami. Inner coxal seta present in leg 3, but absent in legs 1, 2 and 4. Outer setaon basis large (longer than exopod in leg 1), small in legs 2–4. Inner distal spine on basis of leg 1 extending to distal border of first endopodal segment, 28 μm long. Exopods of legs 2–4 bearing only setae. Legs 2–4 asymmetrical: setae on endopods long on left legs, but those of right legs short and blunt at tip (cf. Fig. 187E and 187F View FIGURE 187 ). Exopod slightly longer than endopod in leg 1, and about 1.5 times longer in legs 2–4. Legs 3 and 4 with different armature formula between left and right legs. Armature formula for legs 1–4 as follows:
Leg 5 ( Fig. 187G View FIGURE 187 ) consisting of short but broad protopodalplate (formed byfusedleft and right protopods) and free exopodal segments; protopodal plate with 1 seta at each outer distal corner and row of minute spinules near base of exopod; free exopodal segment small, about 3.5 times longerthan wide (38×11 μm), lacking ornamentation, armed with 1 seta at outer distalcorner.
Male. Unknown.
Remarks. The distinctive wing-like projections on the metasome have not been recorded previously in related genera.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
SubPhylum |
Tunicata |
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |