Chelipygus dinardensis, Kim & Boxshall, 2020

Kim, Il-Hoi & Boxshall, Geoff A., 2020, Untold diversity: the astonishing species richness of the Notodelphyidae (Copepoda: Cyclopoida), a family of symbiotic copepods associated with ascidians (Tunicata), Megataxa 4 (1), pp. 1-6 : 406-409

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/megataxa.4.1.1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6421649

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C487CB-EEC4-3BAD-FF4D-F9ADFF24F9F8

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Chelipygus dinardensis
status

gen. et sp. nov.

Chelipygus dinardensis gen. et sp. nov.

( Figs. 269 View FIGURE 269 , 270 View FIGURE 270 )

Typematerial. Holotype (intact ♀, MNHN-IU-2014- 21339 ) anddissectedparatype (♀, figured) from Molgula bleizi (Lacaze-Duthiers, 1877) (MNHN-IT-2008-5425 = MNHNS 3/ MOL.A/206), La Rance, Dinard, France, Monniot coll., 1982.

Additionalmaterial. 2 ♀♀ (MNHN-IU-2018-1876) from M. bleizi, Morgat ; 1 ♀ (MNHN-IU-2018-1877) and 1 dissected ♀ from M. bleizi, Morgat ; 1 ♀ (MNHN-IU-2018-1878) from M. complanata Alder & Hancock, 1870 , Carteret; 1 ♀ (MNHN-IU-2018-1879) from M. citrina Alder & Hancock, 1848, Dinard; 1 ♀ (dissected) from M. complanata , Saint-Vaast-La-Hougue. France.

Etymology. The name of the type locality, Dinard on the Atlantic coast of France, is the basis for the specific name of the new species.

Descriptionoffemale. Body ( Fig. 269A View FIGURE 269 ) strongly compressed laterally: bodylength 3.26 mm. Prosome consistingof small cephalosome with well developed dorsalshieldandunsegmented,dorsallyinflatedmetasome. Metasome not divided, lacking any trace of suture lines or constrictions, entire metasome forming brood pouch. Dorsal inflation of metasome variable according to reproductive status of individual female, 2.01×1.72 mm in lateral view in strongly inflated specimen ( Fig. 269A View FIGURE 269 ). Freeurosome ( Fig. 269B View FIGURE 269 ) short, 5-segmented. Genital somite characteristically with large, robust posteroventral protuberance (indicated by arrowhead in Fig. 269B View FIGURE 269 ) with rounded tip in middle of distal margin. Caudal ramus ( Fig. 269C View FIGURE 269 ) graduallynarrowing distally, 3.8 times longerthan wide (179×47 μm) and about 1.3 timeslongerthan anal somite: armedwith 2 setae (outer proximal and dorsal) and 4 small distal spines; outer proximal and dorsal setae positioned at 35 and 70% of ramus length, respectively, about half as long as width of ramus at base; distal spines conical, atmost 15μmlong, bluntly tipped.Spermatophore ( Fig. 270A View FIGURE 270 ) detached from female elliptical, 91×45 μm.

Rostrum ( Fig. 269D View FIGURE 269 ) subtriangular, 108×103 μm, slightly longerthan wide, with gently tapering proximal three quarters and tapering more steeply in distal quarter. Antennule ( Fig. 269E View FIGURE 269 ) 274 μmlong, 8-segmented; first and second segments much broader than distal segments; armatureformula 3, 17, 9+aesthetasc, 3, 2+aesthetasc, 2, 2+aesthetasc, and 7+aesthetasc; 2 large setae on first segment pinnate, all other setae naked. Antenna ( Fig. 269F View FIGURE 269 ) stout, 4-segmented; coxa unarmed; basis 75×55 μm, unarmed; first endopodal segment 64×54 μm, with small seta subdistally on medial side; compound distal endopodal segment markedly narrower than proximal segments, graduallynarrowing distally, about 2.1 times longerthanwide (73×35 μm); armedwith 9 setae (arranged as 1, 3, 2, and 3) plusterminal claw about 65 μm long, only slightly shorter than segment.

Labrum ( Fig. 269G View FIGURE 269 ) with setulose posterior margin and large, setulose posteromedian lobe. Mandible ( Fig. 269H View FIGURE 269 ) with 5 teeth and 2 small setae on gnathobase: basiswith 1 setaat mediodistal corner; exopod with 5 setae; 3 proximal setae equally large; fourth seta shorter, (half length of proximal setae), distalmost seta vestigial (arrowhead in Fig. 269H View FIGURE 269 ); endopod 2-segmented, incompletely articulated from basis; first segment with 4 setae on medial margin; second segment distinctly narrowerthan first, armedwith 9 setae. Maxillule ( Fig. 269I View FIGURE 269 ) with 9 setae on arthrite, 1 broad, blunt seta on coxal endite, 2 unequal setae on epipodite, 3 setae on medial margin of basis (proximal seta slightly shorter than distal 2), 4 setae on exopod (3 equally long medial and 1 longer outer), and 2 setaeon endopod. Maxilla ( Fig. 270B View FIGURE 270 ) armedwith 9 setaeonsyncoxa (arranged as 3, 1, 2, and 3), 3 setae on basis (distal seta 0.7 times length of middle seta), and 1, 1, and 3 setae, respectively, on first to third endopodal segments. Maxilliped ( Fig. 270C View FIGURE 270 ) incompletely 2-segmented, articulation present on only one surface; armed with 9 setae on first and 2 setae on short second segment.

Leg 1 ( Fig. 270D View FIGURE 270 ) with 3-segmented rami. Outer seta on basis naked, thinner (flagellate) in distal third. Inner distal spine on basis 42 μm long, spinulose, extending to distal border of first endopodal segment. Legs 2–4 with 3-segmented exopods and 2-segmented endopods ( Fig. 270E, F View FIGURE 270 ); exopods slightly longerthan endopods. Inner seta on coxa relatively longer than in leg 1. Outer and distal setae on exopods naked. Distalsetae on endopods naked and shortened. Armature formula for legs 1–4 as follows:

  Coxa Basis Exopod Endopod
Leg 1 0-0 1-I I-1; I-1; II, 2, 3 0-1; 0-1; 1, 2, 2
Leg 2 0-0 1-0 1-1; 1-1; 3, 1, 4 0-1; 0-1; 1, 2, 3
Leg 3 0-0 1-0 1-1; 1-1; 2, 1, 4 0-1; 0-1; 1, 2, 3
Leg 4 0-0 0-0 1-1; 1-1; 2, 1, 3 0-0; 0, 2, 1
  Coxa Basis Exopod Endopod
Leg 1 0-1 1-I I-1; I-1; III, I, 4 0-1; 0-1; 1, 2, 3
Legs 2 & 30-1 1-0 1-1; 1-1; 3, 1, 5 0-1, 1, 2, 5
Leg 4 0-1 1-0 1-1; 1-1; 2, 1, 5 0-1; 1, 2, 4

Leg 5 ( Fig. 270G View FIGURE 270 ) protopod indistinctly articulated from somite, broad, with seta on outer margin and row of spinules on distal border; free exopodal segment about 1.9 times longerthanwide (98×52 μm), gradually narrowing distally, with slightly irregular margins; armed distally with small, spiniform medial seta (18 μm long) and longer outer seta (47 μm long); ornamented with 3 rows of spinules on dorsomedial surface.

Male. Unknown.

Remarks. The large ventrodistal protuberance on the genital somite seems to be the most distinctive feature of Chelipygus dinardensis gen. et sp. nov. It is unique and serves to differentiate it not only from its congeners but also from species of closely related genera. The small size of the distalmost seta on the apex of the mandibular exopod is also a characteristic feature, distinguishing C. dinardensis gen. et sp. nov. from both of its congeneric species.

MNHNS

Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle

MOL

Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF