Purenleon, , Stange, 2002
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1163/1876312X-00002200 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:60248D20-9813-4397-BEC3-39908FE7688A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3794387 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C4F175-AD48-FFE2-9563-FF16960DD1A0 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Purenleon |
status |
|
Identification key to the South American species of Purenleon View in CoL View at ENA
1. Mid tibia greatly swollen ( Fig. 9d View Fig ), distinctly broader than foretibia; basitarsus of hind leg about twice as long as greatest diameter; posterior margin of sternite VII in the female elongated laterally ( Fig. 10f View Fig ), like a small gonapophyses (tibialis gr oup)…….….….….….….….…….….….….….….….….….….….….….…...2
1’. Mid tibia weakly swollen ( Fig. 2d View Fig ), about equal in breadth to foretibia; basitarsus of hind leg at least 2.5 times longer than greatest diameter; sternite VII of female not produced laterally ( Fig. 4b View Fig ) (bistictus group)….….….….….….….….….….5
2. Thorax mostly dark brown ( Fig. 7d View Fig )…….….….….….….….….….….….….…. 3
2’. Thorax mostly yellow ( Fig. 9b View Fig )............................................................................ 4
3. Forewing with small brown marks on the base of most radial crossveins; mid tibia mostly dark brown with light brown areas; male parameres not dorsally enlarged and with apex sclerotized and rough; female with pregenital plate reduced…….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….. P.fernandezi View in CoL
3’. Forewing without small brown marks on the base of most radial crossveins ( Fig. 9b View Fig ); mid tibia mostly yellow with dark brown marks ( Fig. 9d View Fig ); male parameres dorsally enlarged (forming a dome) ( Fig. 10b View Fig ) and with apex not sclerotized; female pregenital plate large and ventrally extended ( Fig. 10f View Fig )…….….….. P. rafaeli sp. n.
4. Pronotum with several elongate white setae at lateral margin, at least subequal in length to those on forecoxa; mid tibia mostly dark brown, with few yellow areas; male mediuncus absent and paramere not folding apically …….….….…. P. tibialis View in CoL
4’. Pronotum with few elongate white setae at lateral margin, shorter than those on forecoxa; mid tibia yellow with small rounded dark marks on the base of the long setae ( Fig. 7b View Fig ); male mediuncus present and paramere folding apically ( Fig. 8d View Fig )…….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….. P. limeirai sp. n.
5. Forewing with posterior Banksian line clearly evident; hind wing with a longitudinal apical brown mark ( Fig. 6 View Fig )…….….….….….….….….….….….….….. P.nebulosus
5’. Forewing posterior Banksian line not evident; hind wing without a longitudinal apical brown mark ( Fig. 3 View Fig ) …….….….….….….….….….….….….….….…..6
6. Area between antennae yellow ( Fig. 2a View Fig ); forefemur set with some short black setae; male ectoproct with postventral lobe ( Fig. 3 View Fig )…….….….….….….….….. P. cautus View in CoL
6’. Area between antennae dark brown; forefemur covered with many medium sized black or white setae; male ectoproct without postventral lobe …….….….….…..7
7. Pronotum with several elongate white setae at lateral margin, at least subequal in length to those on forecoxa; male paramere with apex without a concave excavation…….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….…..… P. andinus View in CoL
7’. Pronotum without elongate white setae at lateral margin, sometimes one or two moderately long white setae; male paramere with an apical concave excavation…….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….…….. P. clavatus View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |