Oribatula amblyptera Berlese, 1916
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1051/acarologia/20132086 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4697107 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C5D278-3D36-FF94-FC4A-FA44FB48F920 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Oribatula amblyptera Berlese, 1916 |
status |
|
Oribatula amblyptera Berlese, 1916
( Figure 2 View FIGURE )
Literature — Berlese (1916), Mahunka (1994), Weigmann (2006).
Material examined — 5 – 9 specimens of 2 populations, from the Danube Delta (cultivated soil) and Prut river meadow (pasture) .
Diagnosis — Species of medium size (Table 1), yellowish to light chestnut in colour. Cuticle smooth, without ornamentation. Prodorsum with ribbon shaped lamella; lamellar apex concave, and its median angle prominent; a short and curved prolamella can be observed. Prodorsal setae robust, finely barbed. Sensillus relatively short, fusiform clavate, with rounded end. ( Table 2). Notogaster with 13 pairs of simple and thin notogastral setae, often hardly observable; the 4 pairs of areae porosae are round and small, placed in the usual position. Ventral side has the aspect and chaetotaxy characteristic for the genus.
Remarks — Although considered as synonym of O. tibialis ( Subias 2004, 2012), O. amblyptera differs from the nominate species by a number of characters, such as: body size, shape and length of sensillus, smaller areae porosae, especially Aa, shorter notogastral and prodorsal setae in and le (Tables 1, 2).
Distribution — Southern and Central Europe ( Weigmann 2006). In Romania this species was recently recorded in the Eastern region, in wet soils, including cultivated ones, from Prut river meadow and the Danube Delta ( Ivan 2009).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |