Erythria cuspiprojecta, Kang, Juxia & Zhang, Yalin, 2012
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.281275 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6166769 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C687B8-C642-FF84-FF14-FB8FCE0BF94B |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Erythria cuspiprojecta |
status |
sp. nov. |
Erythria cuspiprojecta View in CoL sp. nov. ( Figs. 2, 5, 8 View FIGURES 1 – 9. 1 – 3 , 16–22 View FIGURES 16 – 22 )
Body brown. Pair of round brownish-black patches at sides of coronal suture and other irregularly shaped dark brown patches on pronotum, scutum orange-yellow with three blackish patches, scutellum yellowish brown ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 9. 1 – 3 ). Fore wing yellowish brown with patches between light bordered veins, hind wing weakly semitransparent with veins yellowish brown.
Male genitalia: Pygofer with sclerotized appendage at its blunt hind upper angle ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 16 – 22 ). Margin of subgenital plate folded dorsad at midlength with apex rounded ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 16 – 22 ). Apical extension of paramere straight, tapered ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 16 – 22 ). Penis stem smooth, with narrow apodeme and two long, thin apical processes pointed apically ( Figs. 21, 22 View FIGURES 16 – 22 ). Gonopore apical.
Measurement: Male 2.9 mm (including wing); Female 3.0 mm (including wing).
Material examined: Holotype 3, Sichuan Prov., Emeishan Mountain: Xixiangchi, 9 September 1988, coll. Xu Qiuyuan, Zhou Jingruo and Zheng Shuling.
Remarks: The new species resembles E. rudobreva ( Dworakowska 1993: 152, 153, 165), but can be distinguished from the latter by the large sclerotized pygofer appendage, and the penis stem without sculpture, with the apical processes longer and the apodeme larger.
Etymology: The specific epithet is derived from the Latin words “cusp-” and “projectus”, referring to the sharp end of the apical penis appendages.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |