Tenedos tatama, Martínez & Brescovit & Quijano, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5130.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:ABF61117-DD64-4A32-BD61-20E577F80C3D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7625299 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C787B1-FF9C-FFF3-D49C-F99D0F7FFA9E |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Tenedos tatama |
status |
sp. nov. |
Tenedos tatama View in CoL sp. n.
Figs 69–71 View FIGURE 69 View FIGURE 70 View FIGURE 71 ; 107 View FIGURE 107 .
Type material. Holotype: COLOMBIA. Risaralda: Puerto Rico, Cuchilla La Linea, Parque Natural Nacional Tatamá , mixed forest, Pitfall trap, 2620-2680m [5°08′54″N, 76°02′00″W], A. Pulido & E. González leg., 21-23.VIII.2004, 1 ♂ (IAvH-I-2965) GoogleMaps . Paratypes: COLOMBIA. Risaralda: Santa Rosa de Cabal, Vereda Campo Alegrito, Parque Mu-nicipal Natural Campo Alegre , Finca La Albania, Secondary forest , Pitfall trap, 2490m [4°52′03″N, 75°32′48″W], A. Pulido & Y. Martínez leg., 22-24.II.2004, 1 ♀ (IAvH-I-666) GoogleMaps .
Etymology. The specific name is a noun in apposition taken from the type locality.
Diagnosis. Males of Tenedos tatama sp. n., resemble those of T. santarosa sp. n., and T. eberhardi sp. n., by shape and bifid retrolateral tibial apophysis (RTA); large median apophysis (MA) ( Figs 64A–D View FIGURE 64 ; 65A–B View FIGURE 65 ; 67A–D View FIGURE 67 ; 68A–B View FIGURE 68 ; 70A–D View FIGURE 70 ; 71A–B View FIGURE 71 ), but are distinguished by thinner posterior branch of the retrolateral tibial apophysis (pRTA) with thin posterior tip; large median apophysis, anteriorly concave ( Figs 70A–D View FIGURE 70 ; 71A–B View FIGURE 71 ). Females are similar those of Tenedos santarosa sp. n., and T. eberhardi sp. n. by can be distinguished by very large, rounded median field plate (MFP); thin seminal receptacles (SR), slightly curved towards median septum ( Figs 64E–F View FIGURE 64 ; 65C–D View FIGURE 65 ; 67E–F View FIGURE 67 ; 68C–D View FIGURE 68 ; 70E–F View FIGURE 70 ; 71C–D View FIGURE 71 ).
Description. Male (Holotype, IAvH-I-2965). Coloration ( Fig. 69A–B View FIGURE 69 ): carapace uniformly dark brown. Chelicerae with paturon brown, fangs brown-reddish. Endites brown, white on anterior region. Labium and sternum light brown. Legs: Coxae I–IV light yellow. Femora I–IV with base brown, white on medial region and distally brown. Patellae dark brown. Tibia I pale yellow, II–IV brown with light patches. Metatarsi I–IV yellow with brown patches. Tarsi I–IV dark brown. Abdomen: dorsally dark gray only can distinguish six white guanine spots organized as follows: two elongated spots, anteriorly positioned; two oval spots smaller than previous ones, sub-medially positioned; two transversal and large spots, medially positioned. Laterally dark gray without spots. Ventrally dark gray with small spots on lateral sides and a long and wide central spot. Spinnerets light brown. Measurements: total length 5.40, carapace length 2.76, width 1.83, height 1.27. Clypeus height 0.57. Eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.08, ALE 0.09, PME 0.11, PLE 0.13; AME–AME 0.20, AME–ALE 0.23, AME–PME 0.24, PME–PME 0.25, PME–PLE 0.33, ALE–PLE 0.24. Chelicerae 0.74 length. Sternum length 1.08, width 1.01. Legs: I—femur 1.80/ patella 0.66/ tibia 1.59/ metatarsus 1.39/ tarsus 1.09/ total 6.53; II—1.53/ 0.73/ 1.20/ 1.29/ 0.76/ 5.51; III—1.43/ 0.73/ 1.02/ 1.20/ 0.68/ 4.91; IV—1.81/ 0.72/ 1.48/ 1.86/ 0.93/ 6.80. Abdomen length 2.31. Legs spines pattern (only the differences from the general pattern): I-II—tibia v1r-1r-0, metatarsus v1r-1r-2; III—metatarsus v2-1p-2; IV—tibia v2-2-2. Palp: retrolateral process of the cymbium (RPC) long, widening towards base; tegulum (T) rounded; subtegulum (St) large, longer than wide in ventral view; conductor (C) large, with short, thin sclerotized region on distal side; appendix (ApC) short, apically sharp; embolus (E) long, filiform towards apex; base of embolus approximately as long as basal tegular membrane; basal tegular membrane (BTM) wide, originated basally on tegulum, reticulated, very short, apically rounded; spermatic ducts (SD) S-shaped, short, wide, with both folds full open; ventral tibial apophysis (VTA) large, anteriorly projected; median apophysis (MA) large, wide, strongly sclerotized with small posterior projection; retrolateral tibial apophysis (RTA) large, almost as long as palpal tibia, apically bifid, anterior branch (aRTA) very short, posterior (pRTA) thin ( Figs 70A–D View FIGURE 70 ; 71A–B View FIGURE 71 ).
Female (Paratype, IAvH-I-666). Coloration and abdominal pattern of spots as male, carapace uniformly brown ( Fig. 69C–D View FIGURE 69 ). Measurements: total length 5.76, carapace length 2.89, width 2.01, height 1.48. Clypeus height 0.53. Eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.10, ALE 0.09, PME 0.11, PLE 0.12; AME–AME 0.21, AME–ALE 0.26, AME–PME 0.28, PME–PME 0.27, PME–PLE 0.40, ALE–PLE 0.26. Chelicerae 0.82 length. Sternum length 1.17, width 1.07. Legs: I—femur 1.72/ patella 0.76/ tibia 1.65/ metatarsus 1.38/ tarsus 0.94/ total 6.45; II—1.48/ 0.74/ 1.22/ 1.15/ 0.75/ 5.34; III—1.42/ 0.68/ 0.99/ 1.18/ 0.82/ 5.09; IV—1.85/ 0.71/ 1.33/ 1.95/ 0.99/ 6.83. Abdomen length 2.81. Legs spines pattern (only the differences from the general pattern): I—tibia v2-1r-2, metatarsus v1r-0-2; II—metatarsus v1r-0-2; II—metatarsus v2-0-2. Epigyne: lateral borders (LB) short, curved towards posteromedial region of epigyne, forming medial, large atrium (A); median field plate (MFP) very large, rounded; copulatory ducts (CD) very short, wide, almost undistinguished from spermathecae; seminal receptacles (SR) long, rounded at medial region, lightly curved towards median septum; spermathecae (S) large, irregulars, posteriorly positioned; fertilization ducts (FD) almost as long as spermathecae length ( Figs 70E–F View FIGURE 70 ; 71C–D View FIGURE 71 ).
Distribution. Known from Risaralda department ( Fig. 107 View FIGURE 107 ).
Remark. Female and male were matched by having the same abdomen spots patterns and the localities where these specimens are closely related.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |