Tenedos eberhardi, Martínez & Brescovit & Quijano, 2022

Martínez, Leonel, Brescovit, Antonio D. & Quijano, Luis G., 2022, Revealing the diversity of ant-eating spiders in Colombia I: morphology, distribution and taxonomy of the barronus group of the genus Tenedos O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1897 (Araneae: Zodariidae), Zootaxa 5130 (1), pp. 1-154 : 90-94

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5130.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:ABF61117-DD64-4A32-BD61-20E577F80C3D

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6520639

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C787B1-FFA4-FFCB-D49C-F9090E33F9BD

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Tenedos eberhardi
status

sp. nov.

Tenedos eberhardi View in CoL sp. n.

Figs 63–65 View FIGURE 63 View FIGURE 64 View FIGURE 65 ; 106 View FIGURE 106 .

Type material. Holotype: COLOMBIA. Risaralda: Pereira, Santuario de Flora y Fauna Otún Quimbaya , Camino Cuchilla , Secondary forest of forest dominated by Quercus humboldti, Pitfall trap, 1960m [4°44′N, 75°35′W], G. López leg., 30.III-20.IV.2004, 1 ♂ (IAvH-I-659) GoogleMaps . Paratypes: same data as the holotype, 1 ♀ (IAvH-I-585), Robledal, 1980m, same collector, 12-28.VII.2004, 1 ♂ (IAvH-I-660) GoogleMaps .

Etymology. The specific epithet is a patronymic in honor of the eminent arachnologist William Eberhard by his many contributions on ethology and evolution of the spiders, mainly focused on the spider webs evolution.

Diagnosis. Males of Tenedos eberhardi sp. n., resembles T. santarosa sp. n. and T. tatama sp. n., by wide posterior branch of the retrolateral tibial apophysis (pRTA) and thin anterior branch (aRTA) ( Figs 64A–D View FIGURE 64 ; 65A–B View FIGURE 65 ; 67A–D View FIGURE 67 ; 68A–B View FIGURE 68 ; 70A–D View FIGURE 70 ; 71A–B View FIGURE 71 ), further this species is distinguished from T. santarosa sp. n. by having nine dorsal abdominal spots (vs thirteen T. santarosa sp. n.). Males are diagnosed by flattened median apophysis (MA) with very short anterior tip, wide posterior branch of the retrolateral tibial apophysis (pRTA). Females are characterized by lateral borders (LB) reaching the basal region of median field plate (MFP); median field plate flattened in dorsal surface; seminal receptacle forming glass-shaped lumen in dorsal view ( Figs 64E–F View FIGURE 64 ; 65C–D View FIGURE 65 ; 67E–F View FIGURE 67 ; 68C–D View FIGURE 68 ; 70E–F View FIGURE 70 ; 71C–D View FIGURE 71 ).

Description. Male (Holotype, IAvH-I-659). Coloration ( Fig. 63A–B View FIGURE 63 ): carapace uniformly dark brown. Chelicerae with paturon brown, fangs brown-reddish. Endites brown, white on anterior region. Labium and sternum brown. Legs: Coxae I–IV light yellow. Femora I–IV brown, with a medial light patch. Patellae-tibiae dark brown. Metatarsus I pale yellow with brown patches on basal and distal sides, II–IV brown. Tarsi I–IV brown. Abdomen: dorsally dark gray with nine white guanine spots organized as follows: two elongated spots, anteriorly positioned; two oval spots larger than previous ones, medially positioned; two transversal and small spots, in posteromedial position; three transversal and wide spots joined in median region, posteriorly positioned. Laterally dark gray without spots. Ventrally dark gray with small spots on lateral sides and a long and wide central spot. Spinnerets light brown. Measurements: total length 6.15, carapace length 3.38, width 2.19, height 1.38. Clypeus height 0.67. Eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.12, ALE 0.14, PME 0.11, PLE 0.17; AME–AME 0.25, AME–ALE 0.33, AME–PME 0.35, PME–PME 0.36, PME–PLE 0.47, ALE–PLE 0.35. Chelicerae 0.81 length. Sternum length 1.25, width 1.06. Legs: I—femur 2.07/ patella 0.78/ tibia 1.96/ metatarsus 1.61/ tarsus 1.42/ total 7.84; II—1.79/ 0.70/ 1.38/ 1.20/ 0.84/ 5.91; III—1.66/ 0.76/ 1.24/ 1.41/ 0.73/ 5.80; IV—2.15/ 0.98/ 1.69/ 2.17/ 1.02/ 8.91. Abdomen length 2.81. Legs spines pattern (only the differences from the general pattern): II—tibia v1r-1r-1r, metatarsus v1r-1r-2; IV— tibia v2-2-2. Palp: retrolateral process of cymbium (RPC) long, widening towards base; tegulum (T) rounded; subtegulum (St) large, longer than wide in ventral view; conductor (C) large, with short, thin sclerotized region on distal side; appendix (ApC) short, apically sharp; embolus (E) long, laminar at base, filiform towards apex; base of embolus (EB) approximately as long as half of basal tegular membrane; basal tegular membrane (BTM) very wide, originated basally on tegulum, reticulated, very short, apically rounded; spermatic ducts (SD) S-shaped, short, wide, with both folds full open; ventral tibial apophysis (VTA) large, anteriorly projected; median apophysis (MA) large, wide, strongly sclerotized, with small posterior projection very short, concave; posterior branch of the retrolateral tibial apophysis (pRTA) large, almost as long as palpal tibia ( Figs 64E–F View FIGURE 64 ; 65C–D View FIGURE 65 ).

Female (Paratype, IAvH-I-585). Coloration and abdominal pattern of spots as male, except legs uniformly brown ( Fig. 63C–D View FIGURE 63 ). Measurements: total length 5.86, carapace length 3.01, width 1.95, height 1.27. Clypeus height 0.58. Eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.11, ALE 0.12, PME 0.11, PLE 0.18; AME–AME 0.24, AME–ALE 0.28, AME–PME 0.37, PME–PME 0.33, PME–PLE 0.47, ALE–PLE 0.38. Chelicerae 0.85 length. Sternum length 1.16, width 1.04. Legs: I—femur 1.78/ patella 0.71/ tibia 1.57/ metatarsus 1.23/ tarsus 0.94/ total 6.23; II—1.52/ 0.77/ 1.21/ 1.02/ 0.77/ 5.29; III—1.38/ 0.61/ 0.92/ 0.93/ 0.58/ 4.42; IV—1.77/ 0.81/ 1.48/ 1.59/ 0.98/ 6.63. Abdomen length 3.02. Legs spines pattern (only the differences from the general pattern): I—tibia v2-0-0, metatarsus v1r-0-2; II—tibia v1r-1r-0, metatarsus v1r-0-2; III—metatarsus v2-0-2. Epigyne: lateral borders (LB) short, curved towards posteromedial region of epigyne, forming medial, large atrium (A), rounded in apex; median field plate (MFP) very large, sub-quadrangular-shaped; copulatory ducts (CD) short, wide, almost undistinguished from spermathecae; seminal receptacles (SR) long, wide at base, distally thin, lightly curved towards median septum; spermathecae (S) large, irregulars, posteriorly positioned; fertilization ducts (FD) longer than spermathecae length ( Figs 64E–F View FIGURE 64 ; 65C–D View FIGURE 65 ).

Variation. Males (n=2): total length: 5.26–3.15; carapace length: 2.90–3.38; femur I length: 1.93–2.07.

Distribution. Known from Risaralda department ( Fig. 106 View FIGURE 106 ).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Zodariidae

Genus

Tenedos

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF